Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

Consensus weight is no lo ger based on advertised bandwidth to prevent abuse. It is based on measured and observed actual throughput. -- Matt Westfall President & CIO ECAN Solutions, Inc. 804.592.1672 On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan wrote: >Hi, > >After having my Primcast

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

Also you didn't migrate your fingerprint. So it's a new server and will take weeks if not months for the consensus weight to creep up. -- Matt Westfall President & CIO ECAN Solutions, Inc. 804.592.1672 On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan wrote: >Hi, > >After having my Primcas

Re: [tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:30:48 -0500 Neel Chauhan wrote: > After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up for > a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run > a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay. > > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6

[tor-relays] Consensus Weight low when compared to Advertised Bandwidth

Hi, After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up for a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay. https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6672E247BC4656915DF03A470D4B5BC2E7601F While Psychz is a bit