Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-12 Thread x9p
On Fri, December 8, 2017 7:22 am, x9p wrote: > ... > > Thanks again. Am already on the boat. > > cheers. > > x9p The set of "potentially" (no proof!) unwanted relays was updated (looks automagically via script or sort of), still do not have their HSDir flag back, only 17h uptime. Meanwhile, HS u

Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-08 Thread x9p
Original Message Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet From:"nusenu" Date:Fri, December 8, 2017 6:58 am To: tor-relays@lists.torp

Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-08 Thread nusenu
x9p: > > Shouldn't an action be taken against such relays? > > https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/188.214.30 > > They are clearly being run by the same entity/person, probably in an > automated fashion, don't have family set, and are using the same > datacenter. https://nusenu.github.io/OrN

Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-08 Thread x9p
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24526 > > > -- > https://mastodon.social/@nusenu > twitter: @nusenu_ > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >

Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-08 Thread nusenu
> My concerns are more about the HS harvesting/correlation capabilities > these relays have, than de-anonymisation of users. > > I am not a Tor specialist, but would like to know if there are any kind of > safety measures against such persons/entities employing automated big > farms, high speed, s

Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-07 Thread x9p
> Clients don't choose relays in the same /16 in the same circuit. > So I don't think this is a danger to users. Ok. > We would like to write a polite email saying: > "thanks for helping Tor, please add a family to your config". > > But since they haven't provided contact details, we can't do th

Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-05 Thread teor
> On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:14, x9p wrote: > > > Shouldn't an action be taken against such relays? > > https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/188.214.30 > > They are clearly being run by the same entity/person, probably in an > automated fashion, don't have family set, and are using the same > datac

[tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-05 Thread x9p
Shouldn't an action be taken against such relays? https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/188.214.30 They are clearly being run by the same entity/person, probably in an automated fashion, don't have family set, and are using the same datacenter. cheers. x9p _