On Fri, December 8, 2017 7:22 am, x9p wrote:
>
...
>
> Thanks again. Am already on the boat.
>
> cheers.
>
> x9p
The set of "potentially" (no proof!) unwanted relays was updated (looks
automagically via script or sort of), still do not have their HSDir flag
back, only 17h uptime.
Meanwhile, HS u
Original Message
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet
From:"nusenu"
Date:Fri, December 8, 2017 6:58 am
To: tor-relays@lists.torp
x9p:
>
> Shouldn't an action be taken against such relays?
>
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/188.214.30
>
> They are clearly being run by the same entity/person, probably in an
> automated fashion, don't have family set, and are using the same
> datacenter.
https://nusenu.github.io/OrN
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24526
>
>
> --
> https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
> twitter: @nusenu_
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
> My concerns are more about the HS harvesting/correlation capabilities
> these relays have, than de-anonymisation of users.
>
> I am not a Tor specialist, but would like to know if there are any kind of
> safety measures against such persons/entities employing automated big
> farms, high speed, s
> Clients don't choose relays in the same /16 in the same circuit.
> So I don't think this is a danger to users.
Ok.
> We would like to write a polite email saying:
> "thanks for helping Tor, please add a family to your config".
>
> But since they haven't provided contact details, we can't do th
> On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:14, x9p wrote:
>
>
> Shouldn't an action be taken against such relays?
>
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/188.214.30
>
> They are clearly being run by the same entity/person, probably in an
> automated fashion, don't have family set, and are using the same
> datac
Shouldn't an action be taken against such relays?
https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/188.214.30
They are clearly being run by the same entity/person, probably in an
automated fashion, don't have family set, and are using the same
datacenter.
cheers.
x9p
_