Hello,
At least a year ago someone recommended the BeagleBoard-X15 as a Tor
relay, partly due to its speed. The X15 does not seem to be available in
the Netherlands (according to Mouser electronics). Are there any other
comparable boards available in the Netherlands?
Thanks,
James Chase
___
Thanks, isis, for your answer.
I restarted my bridge without the flags and it's been running 7 days and
still no stable flag back. Any experiments you can suggest?
-J Chase
> jchase transcribed 0.8K bytes:
>> Hello,
>> Can anybody help me figure out why my bridge has stopped
Hello,
Can anybody help me figure out why my bridge has stopped showing the
flags fast, running and stable? Especially stable, I would love to get
that flag back. I run two bridges, on two different Rasp Pi's, the one
with a globe fingerprint of B08284109C72C81ACF5866A17A4CC64CE3E16499 .
The other
;20150423204242.65bed...@schwanenlied.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:53:55 +
> jchase wrote:
>> Hello,
>> When I run
>>
>> $ go get git.torproject.org/pluggable-transports/obfs4.git/obfs4proxy
>>
t;
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Installing obfs4 on Raspberry Pi bridge (jchase)
>2. Re: Installing obfs4 on Raspberry Pi bridge (Yawning Angel)
>
>
> ------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Su
Hello,
When I run either ./obfs4proxy or obfs4proxy.go I get:
./obfs4proxy: line 1: /bin: Is a directory
./obfs4proxy: line 2: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./obfs4proxy: line 2: ` * Copyright (c) 2014-2015, Yawning Angel
'
Regards,
J Chase
>> Hello,
>> Thanks to you I have tor 0.2.5.11
Hello,
Thanks to you I have tor 0.2.5.11 running on a Raspberry Pi2 and obfs4
installed from git. I have good news and bad news.
The largest problem is that I get the warning "could not launch managed
proxy executable at '/path/obfs4proxy'('Permission denied')" In the past
this used to be a problem
Thanks for your answer.
Your instructions were good and explicit, but you hit on two of the
problems I run into. I installed tor 0.2.5.11-1 from torproject.org and
got two error messages that I couldn't solve. I would have to go back
and re-install 0.2.5.11-1 to tell you what they were. In any case
Hello,
I run a bridge on a Raspberry Pi running Debian Wheezy and tor 0.2.4.26
. I have obfs3 installed and would like to upgrade to obfs4. So far this
has not been possible. If I understand it correctly, my best bet is to
update to tor 0.2.6.x and then install obfs4. Let me know if I'm wrong.
And
Hello,
I have a bridge up and running for about 6 months. I have two questions.
According to arm my fingerprint is
72DB4EE86C65856E3131A32D8E30EC8A2B72A73D . But if I look up
rasptorholland in globe.torproject.org I find that my fingerprint is
1BCD3EBEFE17EEB86EEDE21D5E2DB8468E2864CF . And again ac
Hi,
I'm running a low-volume bridge on a raspberry pi. Globe.torproject says
that my fingerprint is 1BCD3EBEFE17EEB86EEDE21D5E2DB8468E2864CF . I'm
keeping an eye on myself and traffic via globe.torproject and my
advertised bandwidth makes wild swings: one day its 56 kB/s and the next
day it's 8 kB/
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 08:30:31PM +0000, jchase wrote:
>> On hearing the news that tor 0.2.5.10 was available, I upgraded my
>> raspberry-pi tor (obfuscated bridge) to 0.2.4.something. The upgrade
>> restarted the tor daemon automatically. I would have rather done it
>
Hello,
On hearing the news that tor 0.2.5.10 was available, I upgraded my
raspberry-pi tor (obfuscated bridge) to 0.2.4.something. The upgrade
restarted the tor daemon automatically. I would have rather done it
myself using a restart. When I used arm to look at my new traffic, I
noticed that I had
> From: George Kadianakis
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] obfsproxy not working on bridge relay
> Message-ID: <874mve973h@riseup.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> jchase writes:
>
>> Hi,
>> Due to m limited band
Hi,
Due to m limited bandwidth I've decided to turn my relay into a bridge.
I seem to have everything right except if I restart tor I get a warning
that "managed proxy obfsproxy is 'closed'". I'm sure this has come up in
the past but I can find it in the archives.
In torrc I have:
SocksPort 0
ORPor
, because if my bandwidth is stable then total bandwidth is going
up (and my fraction is going down). Is the same true of my consensus
weight fraction? If I'm going down, the total is going up?
Thanks,
JChase
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-r
Hi,
I have a non-exit relay running Tor 0.2.25 on a Pi. Consensus weight 37.
exit-policy: reject *:* Now Iḿ back from vacation and my relay has 1600
incoming conncts and arm warns me that my bandwidth is too small to
support so many incomers. Would I kindly restrict my reject policy or
limit my Max
17 matches
Mail list logo
