Re: [tor-relays] DSL Router

2018-10-12 Thread fatal
Hello, > You guys are shure it can handle dsl? I am unable to find any > specifications regarding that online. (maybe just to stupid). You have to add a DSL modem, the mikrotik is only a router and not able to do DSL on its own. Options could be a Zyxel VMG1312-B30A which is able to do VDSL up to

[tor-relays] stability of "Sandbox" feature

2017-10-31 Thread fatal
Hey, the Tor manpage still states, that "the [sandbox] option is currently an experimental feature". How 'experimental' is it with e. g. Debian Stretch and using the torproject repo? Give it a try, or wait some more time? tnx f. ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] Over 55k eth RX errors

2017-03-19 Thread fatal
assuming that you run a linux realy, have a look at the interface with ethtool sudo ethtool eth0 and look if it is in full of half duplex mode. If it is in halfduplex mode that will probably be the cause of the errors. you could try setting it to full duplex mode with e. g. 100 mbit/s with the fo

Re: [tor-relays] Reminder: If you are on 0.2.9.x, make sure you are running 0.2.9.9

2017-02-10 Thread fatal
On 09.02.2017 23:56, Paul wrote: > Looks like FreeBSD and most people running BSD is (are) lacking behind - > "sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -y" is not bringing success - what do > you recommend there? use FreeBSD ports, there is 0.2.9.9 available. https://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Voucher

2016-10-26 Thread fatal
33C3 Tickets: Status and Open Sale The ticket contingents of the first phase of our presale are by now exhausted. Only some vouchers (such as the ones sent to angels) can be redeemed from now on. The second phase – the open presale without vouchers – will start in a staggered manner on three days

Re: [tor-relays] Sharing experience with Via Nano 1.6ghz with Padlock hw accel

2016-06-05 Thread fatal
Hello, openssl with enabled padlock and tor stable crashes on my via nano servers running linux and freebsd. without padlock max is ~81 Mbit with linux and ~76 with freebsd (100% load, measured in the last week). On 05.06.2016 17:22, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:01:29 +0200 > "F

Re: [tor-relays] VPS for Exits

2016-05-24 Thread fatal
> https://blazingfast.io/ they shut down my exit without further notice and it was blazingslow ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tip: Cheap fast dedicated servers for exit relays

2016-05-21 Thread fatal
Dear Robert, I personally have no experience with online.net directly nor studied their ToS etc., I refered to the tor wiki: "​Online.net just changed their conditions of sales (2013-07-30) and Tor is no longer unauthorized by the contract. Some Tor relay are now running on Online.net since sever

[tor-relays] Tip: Cheap fast dedicated servers for exit relays

2016-05-20 Thread fatal
Ahoy! they are not in chiapas, they don't have a classy AS and (mostly) no esoteric operating systems. But they are cheap, fast and can be run as exit relays: the budget servers from Oneprovider (http://oneprovider.com/dedicated-servers/budget-servers). Oneprovider resells dedicated servers aroun

Re: [tor-relays] Webtropia threatening with penalty of 5.100€

2015-12-13 Thread fatal
Hey spriver, isn't webtropia is a subcompany of myloc? at least their tos state something like that. While editing the good/bad isp wiki page I just saw that kafkane wrote the following about myloc: "all traffic that is "not contrary to applicable German law" is allowed. already hosts a few exits

Re: [tor-relays] VPS Connection Refused

2015-12-03 Thread fatal
>>> I use debian_tor as my tor group, but I don't think that's the >>> issue. I use Debian for my VPS and adding the normal system user to debian_tor group works for me usermod -a -G debian-tor [user] ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproj

Re: [tor-relays] VPS/dedi paid with bitcoin for exit node anyone?

2015-11-08 Thread fatal
Hello, >I find the infos currently available on TOR project wiki etc little bit >rusty. it's a wiki so feel free to help keeping it up to date (and cleaning it up :) ) I for my part am updating the page every time I gain some new insights (exit running for more than 6 weeks so there is some expe

Re: [tor-relays] Free Domain for Tor Nodes

2015-10-25 Thread fatal
I'd be definately interested! :) On 25.10.2015 06:49, Eran Sandler wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently bought torexitnode.net to make it abundantly clear in reverse > DNS lookup that this is a Tor exit node. > > I've set both of my exit relays tor4thepeople1.torexitnode.net and > tor4thepeople2.tor

Re: [tor-relays] TCP: too many orphaned sockets

2015-10-19 Thread fatal
> i'm unable to assist you with these errors, but are you able to share the > past and new offers with the Tor community? we'd love to run more exit > relays and help mediate the situation with the former provider to ensure > that more relays can be run on their networks. I already updated the wik

[tor-relays] TCP: too many orphaned sockets

2015-10-18 Thread fatal
Hello, I had to move my exit relay to another VPS due to the provider getting annoyed by the abuse mails. The new VPS has exactly the same software setup but only 512 instead of 1024 Mb RAM. Traffic was/is around 45 Mbit/s on both. On the new VPS I get the following message (from time to time lots

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Policy Information != ExitPolicy reject

2015-07-19 Thread fatal
relay descriptor the policy lines are included and if I move the mentioned policy to the top of the policy block in torrc it also appears in Atlas. Thanks! On 19.07.2015 14:55, teor wrote: > >> On 17.07.2015 10:53, Toralf Förster wrote: >>> On 07/17/2015 10:41 AM, fatal wrote:

Re: [tor-relays] Exit Policy Information != ExitPolicy reject

2015-07-17 Thread fatal
no I didn't forget to reload and also restarted after the upgrade to the .10 version. that was > two days ago and the "Descriptor Published Platform" in atlas already shows Tor 0.2.6.10 On 17.07.2015 10:53, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 07/17/2015 10:41 AM, fatal wrote: >

[tor-relays] Exit Policy Information != ExitPolicy reject

2015-07-17 Thread fatal
Hello, I got an abuse report from Webiron requesting me to block a /24 subnet. Accordingly I added "ExitPolicy reject xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24:*" to my torrc file. Looking at the Exit Policy Information at atlas and torstatus xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 doesn't get listed. This worries me a bit. Am I missing somethi

Re: [tor-relays] question terms and conditions servdiscount

2015-07-12 Thread fatal
on as you > run Tor. And of course they will keep the money. > > They kicked us even before we installed anything. Just because of our > domain name torservers.net > > So please don't use them! > > Juris Vetra > https://www.torservers.net/ > > Am 1

[tor-relays] question terms and conditions servdiscount

2015-07-12 Thread fatal
Hello list, hopefully a (preferably german) lawyer is subscribed to this list. I was thinking of starting an exit-relay on a dedicated machine. The german company servdiscount offers very cheap machines with 1 gbit connection (500 mbit guaranteed). They don't mention tor in their terms and condit

Re: [tor-relays] Cheap exit-friedly VPS provider

2015-06-09 Thread fatal
Hello, I'm planning on starting an exit relay at instantservers [1]. They wrote me that they are OK with tor exit nodes, but you are supposed to answer abuse mails within 24h. Maybe anyone else already has some experience with instantservers? server4you also seems to be very cheap...so what happ