Re: [tor-relays] Got my first abuse

On 04/17/2020 02:02 AM, Volker Mink wrote: > you call it dumb. > other call i coursageous. > it was worth a try. i have decent internet connection at home and could > provide > a reliable and fast exit for close to a year. > TOR needs brave people. Well, that does provide residential IPs. And th

Re: [tor-relays] Would you place your secrets or in worst case make your life

On 02/17/2020 05:16 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote: I don't have anything useful to contribute on the main topic, except to agree that more relay diversity would be great, and especially more high capacity exit relays. But I would like to follow up on a few points. > But I'll turn it around, and p

Re: [tor-relays] 10 Years Torservers.net: Death or Future?

On 05/12/2019 12:17 PM, Chris Kerr wrote: > On Saturday, 4 May 2019 11:57:24 CEST Moritz Bartl wrote: >> This is a call for help! > I don't think I could do everything, nor would it be desirable for so much to > depend on one person. However, I am sure that there are a lot of things that >

Re: [tor-relays] is a good idea to run a ssh honeypot?

On 04/07/2019 12:52 PM, caioau wrote: > Hi, I been running a relay for almost 1,5 year, and in the beginning I didn't > change the default 22 ssh port but a lot of people were trying to login , no > worries I only allow public key authentication. > > So I was wondering if I could record the atta

Re: [tor-relays] Tor website overhaul -- who deserves punishment?

On 03/27/2019 03:50 PM, Dave Warren wrote: > On 2019-03-27 16:34, Mirimir wrote: >> On 03/27/2019 09:10 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: >>> Not sure if this is the right place to vent, but here goes: >>> >>> Whoever changed the Tor website's design seems to a) h

Re: [tor-relays] Tor website overhaul -- who deserves punishment?

On 03/27/2019 09:10 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > Not sure if this is the right place to vent, but here goes: > > Whoever changed the Tor website's design seems to a) have a serious > vision impairment and b) done his utmost to hide access to the Tor > source code. > > I think the site feels dumbed

Re: [tor-relays] slow relays

On 01/15/2019 03:23 PM, ronqtorrel...@risley.net wrote: > > >> On Jan 15, 2019, at 11:15, Felix wrote: >> >> Just a guess: Your cpu idles and your bandwidth is underused? >> Put a second relay to your ip. > > Fine idea! Will do. > > --Ron You can use tor-instance-create. With systemd, you can

Re: [tor-relays] Onion v2 HSDir Support (ref: v3 prop224) [was: fishy fingerprint patterns]

On 01/04/2019 09:17 AM, s7r wrote: > Mirimir wrote: >> On 01/03/2019 11:06 PM, teor wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hopefully, we'll have feature parity on v3 very soon. And then >>> apps will migrate from v2 to v3 (or dual-stack). >>> >>&g

Re: [tor-relays] Onion v2 HSDir Support (ref: v3 prop224) [was: fishy fingerprint patterns]

On 01/03/2019 11:06 PM, teor wrote: > Hopefully, we'll have feature parity on v3 very soon. And then > apps will migrate from v2 to v3 (or dual-stack). > > It's best if we transition slowly, in a planned manner. But we do > need to transition in the next few years. Otherwise, we might have > to

Re: [tor-relays] Extreme Exit Policy

On 12/18/2018 09:32 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>> Another more surprising impact for you is that your ssh connections would, >>> counterintuitively, die more often. >>> >>> That's because Tor has a LongLivedPorts option, where streams for those >>> destination ports use circuits with all Stable-flagged r

Re: [tor-relays] Extreme Exit Policy

On 12/18/2018 12:09 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:51:29PM -0700, Mirimir wrote: >> Given that I SSH via Tor a lot, that would suck for me. If too many >> exits didn't allow port 22, anyway. As it is, it's not uncommon for SSH >> logins v

Re: [tor-relays] Extreme Exit Policy

On 12/17/2018 02:34 PM, John Ricketts wrote: > All, > > I am considering only allowing ports 53, 80, and 443 only. Discussion? Given that I SSH via Tor a lot, that would suck for me. If too many exits didn't allow port 22, anyway. As it is, it's not uncommon for SSH logins via Tor to die. Presu

Re: [tor-relays] Who is permanently checking my bridge relay?

On 12/04/2018 06:43 AM, Charly Ghislain wrote: > If it wasn't, would posting the ip address of a client connecting to a > bridge in here compromise her anonymity and/or allow one to > firewall/blacklist her traffic? > Im assuming one could guess the ip address of the running bridge based on > the p

Re: [tor-relays] Relay with VPN

On 11/29/2018 03:24 PM, dead...@tuta.io wrote: > I am using VPN all the time and I wanted to try run relay what > you say make sense, so for the time I try, i'll disconnect VPN. As I said, it's not that hard to create an exception in the VPN client for Tor. So that it connects directly, but

Re: [tor-relays] Relay with VPN

On 11/27/2018 02:18 PM, dead...@tuta.io wrote: > Hi everyone, first time ever using mailing lists. Please let me know if > something I'm doing wrong.  > > I'd like to run a middle relay.  > I'm using Linux mint 19 > > The question. Can i set up relay through VPN? (nordvpn)  > Or if i want relay

Re: [tor-relays] The neighbour's cat just walked in.

On 10/04/2018 08:31 PM, I wrote: > The winning name in the Neighbour's Cat competition is ... Off Topic! Hey, don't be a dumbass ;) Forwarded Message Subject:Re: [tor-relays] Greypony / Conrad Rockenhaus offline? Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:29:53 -0800 From: I Reply-T

Re: [tor-relays] The neighbour's cat just walked in.

On 10/04/2018 07:38 PM, I wrote: > I sent two messages. > One was about the Evil Empire (not USA this time) putting tiny little chips > which send to an anonymous server and which can intercede with commands to > the > CPU to bypass instructions. > Not a jot was heard! > > The other was a tip o

Re: [tor-relays] The neighbour's cat just walked in.

On 10/04/2018 05:59 PM, I wrote: > He realised this list wasn't about him so he left. Yeah, but you didn't ;) ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Greypony / Conrad Rockenhaus offline?

On 10/04/2018 04:43 PM, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: > Hi Matt, > > That project is now in the works. Meanwhile will other community members > continue creating threads about our organization? It has to stop on both > ends otherwise we’re forced to respond when people create threads about us. > > Cordi

Re: [tor-relays] Greypony IT - Public Statement to the Tor Community

On 10/03/2018 03:16 PM, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm writing to you all on behalf of Conrad. There have been a few messages > posted here in regards to Greypony IT and a lack of responses from Conrad. > Conrad is NOT ignoring you nor being malicious. Conrad had a stroke and has >

Re: [tor-relays] Greypony / Conrad Rockenhaus offline?

On 10/02/2018 06:52 PM, niftybunny wrote: > A Tor friendly ISP is gone has nothing to do with a Tor relay mailing list? > >> On 3. Oct 2018, at 03:29, I wrote: >> >> That has nothing to do with this list. Why don't we just wait for Conrad to report? It would be sad if Greypony is dead, but it'

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

On 09/24/2018 06:49 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 24.09.18 02:12, Dave Warren wrote: > >> I don't see anything obvious that addresses my approach (only the >> approach of sending a message from a consistent address out slowly, >> which has several obvious flaws). > > Messages are already uniquel

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

On 09/21/2018 08:32 PM, Dave Warren wrote: > On 2018-09-21 08:57, Ralph Seichter wrote: >> On 21.09.18 16:40, Dave Warren wrote: >> >>> It would be fantastic if the list operators were to track this down >>> and kill it off. >> Imagine an address A subscribed to this mailing list in a read-only >>

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

On 09/21/2018 04:33 PM, Mirimir wrote: > First you get all of the spam from addresses. I did that by exporting > from Thunderbird to text files, and then using grep to grab all of the > "From:" lines. Then I massaged the data in gnumeric, to pull unique > "f...@bar.

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

email > accounts to forward the spam emails to. What else could we do? Well, Google does -- registrar-ab...@google.com -- but staff monitoring it got tired of all my forwarded spam, and told me to use the form ;) But that's too much work. Maybe I'll see if I can script it. > On

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

er you like, or deletes them. So you configure a filter for each one, and forward messages to the appropriate abuse address. > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 2:35 PM Mirimir wrote: > >> On 09/21/2018 01:24 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: >>> >>> ➢ There are lots of technical folk o

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

On 09/21/2018 01:24 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: > > ➢ There are lots of technical folk on these tor lists. > There ought to be at least a few who'd enjoy killing some spam servers. > > What exactly do you mean by “killing them”? If you are referring to forcibly > taking the servers offline, that would

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

gt; far from perfect stop, but it is something. >> >> >> >>- I don't see that as a great improvement. Sex spam doesn't bother me. >> >> >> >> The content isn’t “deeply disturbing” me either, but I use this email >> address and it i

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays

On 09/21/2018 10:50 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:23:48 +, Ralph Seichter wrote: > ... >> I'm not sure what type of spam you are referring to, but when I post to >> this mailing list I see spamming attempts that are directly targeting my >> MX, without using the mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays (was Re: Fwd: Tor GuardRelay)

; >> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 7:47 PM Keifer Bly wrote: >> >>> I looked it up. You can forward the spams that the Gmail address are >>> sending to registrar-ab...@google.com, which reports spam emails and >>> inappropriate content being sent by Gma

Re: [tor-relays] The Assistance and Access Bill 2018

On 09/04/2018 03:19 AM, Paul Templeton wrote: > > On a satire note - > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW-OMR-iWOE > > But seriously - > https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/consultations/assistance-and-access-bill-2018 > And - > https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/national-security/five-cou

Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

On 09/01/2018 04:47 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > I know this is an issue of semantics here, but when you say “Tor Exit in > Turkey censoring access to various access to various websites” you’re kind of > putting the onus on them directly instead of the repressive anti-free speech > regime that

Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

On 09/01/2018 02:56 PM, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: > Recently we've been discussing a Tor Exit in Turkey censoring access to > various websites. > > It's less to some err, disagreements on what should and should not be > allowed. I've seen a few opinions: > *) It grants an outside view at what Turkey

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-talk] Exit in Turkey blocking torproject (komm EA93C), BadExit, Node Subscription Services, Censorship

On 08/31/2018 05:26 PM, I wrote: >>> Anyone else getting nude photos and random links from Cynthia Coleman >>> Matthew Glennon >>> >>> Does she want to be the contact person for an unlimited exit run in >>> Syria? >> >> Maybe worth a try ;) But "she's" just a bot. > > > Then she's the perfect gir

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-talk] Exit in Turkey blocking torproject (komm EA93C), BadExit, Node Subscription Services, Censorship

On 08/31/2018 03:12 PM, I wrote: > > Anyone else getting nude photos and random links from Cynthia Coleman > > > attached to this (and other thread(s) lately? Spam obviously, but ugh. > Matthew Glennon > > Does she want to be the contact person for an

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-talk] Exit in Turkey blocking torproject (komm EA93C), BadExit, Node Subscription Services, Censorship

On 08/31/2018 02:51 PM, Matthew Glennon wrote: > Anyone else getting nude photos and random links from Cynthia Coleman < > cynthiacoleman843...@ru.irzum.com> attached to this (and other thread(s) > lately? Spam obviously, but ugh. > > Matthew Glennon Sure am ;) Somebody could find the abuse conta

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

On 08/27/2018 05:17 PM, Jordan wrote: >> That is an interesting question. Conrad's hosting operation is an >> extreme case, certainly. But consider two independently operated VPS >> relays in the same Digital Ocean data center, with arbitrarily similar >> IP addresses. And consider that both are vu

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

On 08/27/2018 04:42 PM, Jordan wrote: > I'd be much more supportive of the typical "donate x to have a relay > hosted for you" [1][2] rather than "host a relay with us" without > maintaining them under the same family. That is an interesting question. Conrad's hosting operation is an extreme case,

Re: [tor-relays] 4 of Conrad Rockenhaus trial servers are in the top ten exit relays for Canada

Damn, none of this belongs on a public list. And for what it's worth, Ralph Seichter comes off worse than Conrad Rockenhaus does. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Snowflake PT

On 08/22/2018 08:03 PM, teor wrote: > >> On 23 Aug 2018, at 11:22, Mirimir wrote: >> >>> On 08/22/2018 05:41 PM, teor wrote: >>> >>>> On 23 Aug 2018, at 10:16, Mirimir wrote: >>>> >>>> On 08/22/2018 04:17 PM, teor wrote: >

Re: [tor-relays] Snowflake PT

On 08/22/2018 05:41 PM, teor wrote: > Hi, > >> On 23 Aug 2018, at 10:16, Mirimir wrote: >> >> On 08/22/2018 04:17 PM, teor wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don’t know about the current deployment plan for Snowflake, but I >>> can point you to

Re: [tor-relays] Snowflake PT

On 08/22/2018 04:17 PM, teor wrote: > Hi, > > I don’t know about the current deployment plan for Snowflake, but I > can point you to the relevant parts of the git repository: > >> On 22 Aug 2018, at 07:58, Nathaniel Suchy wrote: >> >> Tor Browser 8 Alpha includes the Snowflake PT as it comes nea

Re: [tor-relays] AS awareness (was: Strange Traffic behaviour)

On 07/29/2018 02:26 PM, nusenu wrote: >>> If I know the relays IP I could give you the probabilities of your relay >>> relaying traffic to others in the same AS (since a relay will usually not >>> be used with others in the same /16 netblock) >> >> It'd be better for relays to avoid connecting with

Re: [tor-relays] Strange Traffic behaviour

On 07/29/2018 12:45 AM, nusenu wrote: > Roger Dingledine: >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Tobias Sachs wrote: >>> Because internal traffic is not counted. >> >> Ah, yes, this is what you suggested. Maybe? That's a lot (a large >> fraction) given that Hetzner doesn't have that large

Re: [tor-relays] Relay operators meetup @ Onionspace, Berlin (in solidarity with Torservers)

On 07/27/2018 08:30 AM, Paul wrote: > I was testing FreeBSD > https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.2/FreeBSD-11.2-RELEASE-arm-armv6-RPI2.img.xz > a couple of days ago on a Raspberry2. > > It started a few times, but then out of the blue it came up with a freezing > problem as

Re: [tor-relays] Question regarding ethical torrent blocking

On 07/15/2018 09:23 AM, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > I'm just curious on what thoughts on this are. I know how to technically > perform the block, I guess I feel like we're one of the last bastions > against censorship on the Internet and people do torrent legitimate stuff. > I don't consider pira

Re: [tor-relays] Jerk spammers on tor-relays (was Re: Fwd: Tor Guard Relay)

On 07/13/2018 03:07 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: > Dang. I stopped getting them for a while due to the SPAM filter I > configured in Gmail, however they are now coming through again. These > spammers are trying to be smart by sending these spam messages from > different domains; they are now coming from >

Re: [tor-relays] Coordinated raids of Zwiebelfreunde at various locations in Germany

On 07/04/2018 05:02 AM, nusenu wrote: > > https://blog.torservers.net/20180704/coordinated-raids-of-zwiebelfreunde-at-various-locations-in-germany.html > > https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2018/hausdurchsuchungen-bei-vereinsvorstanden-der-zwiebelfreunde-und-im-openlab-augsburg > > > "The board mem

Re: [tor-relays] Turning down my relay from DigitalOcean

On 07/02/2018 06:41 AM, Jason Odoom wrote: > Guillermo, > > Sorry to read you've also had an issue with this. Please do share if you > are able to find a host that is open to allowing Tor Exit nodes! > > Best, > Jason GigaTux has said that they allow Tor exits. And they run one themselves: http

Re: [tor-relays] Problem implementing IPv6 and NYX info

On 07/01/2018 12:59 PM, arisbe wrote: > Thank you Roman for quick reply.  I had typo on ORPort address that but > just in this email.  My ISP at home and work does not pass Ipv6 so I am > not able to ping/trace.  I think I don't have the resources to work this > problem to satisfactory conclusion s

Re: [tor-relays] ContactInfo-Information-Sharing-Specification

On 07/01/2018 03:18 PM, teor wrote: > >> On 2 Jul 2018, at 02:27, Kay Slake wrote: >> >> I'd like to opt out of to relays. It's too technical for me. Thank you > > You can unsubscribe here: > >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > T Maybe y'all ought to edit t

Re: [tor-relays] bridge installation help please

On 06/25/2018 08:01 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: > Ok. It could be possible your tor installation was somehow corrupted. Try > completely uninstalling tor with this command > > As root: apt-get remove tor > > This should completely uninstall tor > > I am saying this as it could be that somehow one of

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

On 06/15/2018 07:18 AM, The Doctor [412/724/301/703/415/510] wrote: > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On June 14, 2018 8:33 AM, nusenu wrote: > >> this kind of spam also happens if you post emails to tor-dev. >> last spam sender address: rosegregory714...@cc.mexyst.com > > Confirmed. I

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

On 06/14/2018 02:18 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 06/14/2018 04:33 AM, nusenu wrote: >> this kind of spam also happens if you post emails to tor-dev. >> >> last spam sender address: rosegregory714...@cc.mexyst.com > > It seems that they've given up on me, after some da

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

On 06/14/2018 04:33 AM, nusenu wrote: > this kind of spam also happens if you post emails to tor-dev. > > last spam sender address: rosegregory714...@cc.mexyst.com It seems that they've given up on me, after some days with no reply. So is that a pattern for y'all? I finally did review the images

Re: [tor-relays] FW: [#79576] Spam Emails Being Sent To TOR Relay Operators

On 06/12/2018 03:45 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: > Hill all, I wanted to inform that I filed a complaint about the spam emails > and this is the reply I got. Cheers. Thanks! We can lookup any new subdomain on myip.ms to get the IPv4 and abuse contact, and file an abuse report. If we all do that, maybe t

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

e. > > Its possible these spammers are operating similarly / could be the same ones. > >> On Jun 11, 2018, at 5:49 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> >> On 06/11/2018 10:56 AM, Neel Chauhan wrote: >>> It seems that I am getting spam from a new email address: >>> camr

[tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

On 06/11/2018 10:56 AM, Neel Chauhan wrote: > It seems that I am getting spam from a new email address: > camrynbentley870...@ao.ovsum.com > > The pattern is that the emails are from *@*.ovsum.com addresses. Just > block this pattern as well, and report your emails to SpamCop. Oh, and it seems th

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

On 06/11/2018 10:56 AM, Neel Chauhan wrote: > It seems that I am getting spam from a new email address: > camrynbentley870...@ao.ovsum.com > > The pattern is that the emails are from *@*.ovsum.com addresses. Just > block this pattern as well, and report your emails to SpamCop. Yeah, that's us27.a

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: Tor Guard Relay

On 06/10/2018 03:58 PM, grarpamp wrote: > Horny Rose wants to marry and exploit many people, lol. > > Assuming culprit is a stupid nontargeting subscribed address, > list manager does have a way to expose it, users may gripe > though, because even if found, reported, and nuked at the source, > the

Re: [tor-relays] What is the different between Tor browser and Tor source code

On 06/10/2018 01:42 AM, dave` dave wrote: > i guess you have not understand me right: > i downloaded the source code and i had few changes and i compiled it > without errors. > now i want to use my new source code that i created: > how can i do that, never used source code before its a new thing f

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

appy to review some source, and see if some header could be used to block. > From: Mirimir > Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 8:05 PM > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List > > On 06/08/2018 03:48 PM, Keifer Bly w

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

from my iPhone > >> On Jun 8, 2018, at 6:18 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> >>> On 06/08/2018 01:24 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: >>> Hello fellow relay operators, >>> >>> My apologies as this is not related to tor relays, however, there seems to >>> be several

Re: [tor-relays] Spam Emails Received From This Mailing List

On 06/08/2018 01:24 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: > Hello fellow relay operators, > > My apologies as this is not related to tor relays, however, there seems to be > several spammers subscribed to the relay list. Every time I am involved in a > discussion on this list, I receive 3-5 emails supposedly fr

Re: [tor-relays] Running A Bridge Alongside My Relay

o.azurewebsites.net/tor-obfs4-bridge.html But maybe you'd be happier using nano as editor, instead of vi ;) In /etc/tor/torrc you'd want "PublishServerDescriptor 1" instead of "PublishServerDescriptor 0". > From: Mirimir > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 6:56 P

Re: [tor-relays] Running A Bridge Alongside My Relay

On 05/26/2018 01:30 PM, Keifer Bly wrote: > I am subscribed to a vpn service (purevpn) however there service changes > their IP address and location every few minutes. Would this be a useable > bridge? Thank you. It's the custom PureVPN client that's changing servers periodically. If you run stand

Re: [tor-relays] Whatever happened to those 47 PrivateInternetAccess exit relays?

On 04/19/2018 05:30 AM, Matthew Glennon wrote: > I vaguely remember someone announcing them on this list? Did I imagine that? > > Matt Do we know whether they were a PIA project, or whether someone just got some PIA accounts, and forwarded Tor ports to the VPN exits? That would explain why they

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

On 01/18/2018 01:13 PM, I wrote: > They mean that what you are intending to do on their servers should be within > the law. > > Rob "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love is the law, love under will." >> I asked online.net about their cloud ssd vps service and tor and have the >

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

On 01/18/2018 11:54 AM, niftybunny wrote: > You will held responsible to your actions (traffic). So worst case scenario > is: They give your personal data to a LEA and you are now in charge to > explain to a LEO that this is a Tor Exit. > Depends on your country if this is a good idea. If you do

Re: [tor-relays] Balancing throughput versus getting Black-Holed

On 10/25/2017 12:31 PM, teor wrote: > >> On 26 Oct 2017, at 10:23, Mirimir wrote: >> >> On 10/25/2017 11:31 AM, Paul Templeton wrote: >>> >>>> How long is your relay blackholed for? >>> Usually 12Hrs - I'll look at a second IP to see

Re: [tor-relays] Balancing throughput versus getting Black-Holed

On 10/25/2017 11:31 AM, Paul Templeton wrote: > >> How long is your relay blackholed for? > Usually 12Hrs - I'll look at a second IP to see if it helps a bit. > > Having the ability to rotate address would be good... :) > > Paul I wonder how quickly the subnet would get black-holed. I've thoug

Re: [tor-relays] Tor exit nodes attacking SSH?

On 08/08/2017 06:58 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:51:51 -1100 > Mirimir wrote: > >> On 08/08/2017 01:48 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I often run my SSH sessi

Re: [tor-relays] Tor exit nodes attacking SSH?

On 08/08/2017 01:48 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > I often run my SSH sessions via Tor using tsocks. But today I see: > > @@@ > @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ > @

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems

On 06/30/2017 01:43 PM, teor wrote: > >> On 30 Jun 2017, at 19:26, Mirimir wrote: >> >> On 06/29/2017 08:41 PM, teor wrote: >>> >>>> On 30 Jun 2017, at 16:55, Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> >> >>>>Also, is there a problem

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems

On 06/29/2017 08:41 PM, teor wrote: > >> On 30 Jun 2017, at 16:55, Scott Bennett wrote: >> Also, is there a problem with having IPv6-only exit service where a >> relay is accessable via IPv4 for clients and other relays? > > Most tor clients send a DNS name, and flags that say whether the

Re: [tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

any organization >who has SMB publically accessible via the internet (ports >139, 445) should immediately block inbound traffic. > > WTF?!??!?!??!?!? WHY WOULD YOU EVEN ALLOW SMB TRAFFIC FROM > UNTRUSTED INTERNET SOURCES INTO YOUR NETWORK? WHYYYY? Because you're

Re: [tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

On 05/14/2017 08:54 AM, niftybunny wrote: >> Known TOR exit nodes are listed within the Security Intelligence >> feed of ASA Firepower devices. Enabling this to be blacklisted >> will prevent outbound communications to TOR networks. > > Wait, what? | WanaCrypt0r will then download a TOR client fr

[tor-relays] Some n00b questions about exits

I'm thinking about running an IPv6 exit. I've found a Tor-friendly VPS provider, but they have metered bandwidth. And 500GB per month is about my limit. So I could have a 40Mbps/80Mbps exit that was up for maybe a week per month, or a much slower persistently stable exit. For exits, speed is bette

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

On 03/14/2017 12:03 PM, Matt Traudt wrote: > > > On 3/14/17 13:32, Volker Mink wrote: >> Hey Folks. >> >> >> >> I am going to change my Exit to a Bridge or whatever. >> >> When im browsing the Web i receive tons auf capchas and my KODI >> mediacenter >> is unable to update itself. >> >> I have my

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

On 02/08/2017 11:25 AM, DaKnOb wrote: > So less than 24 hours after the previous post and someone, > mysteriously, subscribed the abuse mailbox to > 2,000 newsletters.. > Of course I do not have proof nor am interested on who’s behind this > and it didn’t cause any bad, just good (gave me plenty of

Re: [tor-relays] Proposing an Exit Node

On 01/17/2017 12:00 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:49:46PM -0700, Mirimir wrote: >> Or you need adequate anonymity, and be willing to lose sunk cost. > > I think trying to run exit relays with anonymity, and with plans to > discard them as needed, i

Re: [tor-relays] Proposing an Exit Node

On 01/16/2017 11:08 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > > On 01/16/2017 11:49 AM, Olaf Grimm wrote: >> An exit node at home is funny. Last year I've got visitors from law >> enforcement early in the morning. Now I have some new "friends" from the >> police department. >> >> Be warned! They take a look on

Re: [tor-relays] How can we trust the guards?

On 01/02/2017 06:08 PM, teor wrote: > >> On 3 Jan 2017, at 11:46, Mirimir wrote: >> >>> I believe that what is needed is changing Tor to accommodate a >>> lot of small relays running by a very large number of volunteers, >>> and to push real traffic

Re: [tor-relays] How can we trust the guards?

On 01/01/2017 11:28 PM, Rana wrote: > I believe that what is needed is changing Tor to accommodate a > lot of small relays running by a very large number of volunteers, > and to push real traffic through them. Alternately, you need lots of small relays, running (with plausible deniability) on I

Re: [tor-relays] How can we trust the guards?

On 01/02/2017 06:56 AM, Aeris wrote: >>> Tor model breaks down when facing a modest government adversary for the >>> simple reason that having only 7000 relays total, with a minority of >>> them carrying most of the traffic, invites cheap infiltration and >>> takeover by state adversaries. >> >> Ye

Re: [tor-relays] How can we trust the guards?

On 01/02/2017 12:53 AM, Rana wrote: > @Mirimir >>> This is not Blockchain where hundreds of thousands of greedy selfish >>> genes are working together for non-collusion. A practically zero- >>> effort collusion of already fully cooperating FIVE EYE agencies (US,

Re: [tor-relays] How can we trust the guards?

On 01/01/2017 11:28 PM, Rana wrote: > @Mirimir, @Andreas >>> This assumes that there is only one entity wanting to do that. >>> When there are multiple the game isn't that easy. > >> Yes, that is a great Tor feature! Dueling adversaries strengthen >> To

Re: [tor-relays] How can we trust the guards?

On 01/01/2017 03:42 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 23:54:03 +, Rana wrote: > ... >> I do not see how Sybil attacks relate to my question. The adversary will >> simply set up new nodes, without messing with attacking identities of >> existing ones. > > It will not go quite unno

Re: [tor-relays] how many tor relay could run on a single machine/IP?

On 12/02/2016 02:13 AM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 12/02/2016 10:07 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote: >> I'm trying to stress some very small dedicated server with ViaNano >> and Atoms and would like to try out multiple Tor relay with AES hw >> acceleration to see the limits > AFAIC ther

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

On 11/21/2016 04:21 PM, Kevin Zvilt wrote: > Kevin from Cairo, still trying to set up Tor as a functioning browser. Oops. I lost track of what list this is :( Better to use tor-talk for such questions. But I think that I know the answer. The DisableNetwork option in Tor can get wedged on (value

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

On 11/21/2016 04:21 PM, Kevin Zvilt wrote: > Kevin from Cairo, still trying to set up Tor as a functioning browser. What's the problem? > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:19 AM, wrote: > >> I am in the same position. >> >> >> 2016-11-21 23:17 GMT+01:00 pa011 : >> >>> Looking to meet other Exits in Ham

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

On 10/25/2016 03:39 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 25.10.2016 09:58, Mirimir wrote: > >> OK, I've emailed you. > > Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful > information but not share it here and make it available for future > list archiv

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

On 10/25/2016 12:49 AM, Petrusko wrote: > Absolutely interested ! with pleasure :) > Will it be a link, or a file...? if you prefer sending it directly to > this mail address... > > Thx in advance ;) OK, I've emailed you. > Mirimir : >> I have a how-t

Re: [tor-relays] cryptsetup some folders

On 10/24/2016 04:04 PM, Petrusko wrote: > Many thx for your contribution, thx to you 2 :) > > I was thinking too about the full disk encryption. > No problem to backup/restore current files. > > Sadly Raspbian, and many others OS for the RPi, have not many options > like x86 when you set up the s

Re: [tor-relays] Intrusion Prevention System Software - Snort or Suricata

On 10/06/2016 05:39 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 06.10.16 12:57, oco...@email.cz wrote: > >> You probably will invest your time, but the ISP won't. The amount of >> the problems is multiplying. Tor should evolve, or it will extinct >> like dinosaurs. > > I don't think that Tor has a problem. It

Re: [tor-relays] Intrusion Prevention System Software - Snort or Suricata

On 10/05/2016 10:43 PM, Green Dream wrote: for i in subdir/*; do ssh host mkdir -p "$i"; done with an ssh-agent would look pretty exactly the same to the exit node. >>> >>> OK, so I left out the "Permission denied, please try again." bits :) >> >> The exit node doesn't see that - t

Re: [tor-relays] Intrusion Prevention System Software - Snort or Suricata

On 10/05/2016 02:39 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:48:19 +0000, Mirimir wrote: > ... >> exits unpredictably unreliable. On the other hand, IPS that only blocked >> automated crap would be a win for real users, relay operators and ISPs, >> no? Why sho

Re: [tor-relays] Intrusion Prevention System Software - Snort or Suricata

On 10/05/2016 12:58 PM, Green Dream wrote: > @Mirimir: > > >>> IPS aren't perfect - they let some unwanted traffic through, and >>> block other traffic that is totally ok. > > >> That is an issue. But there are many exits, so eventually users should

Re: [tor-relays] Intrusion Prevention System Software - Snort or Suricata

On 10/05/2016 01:27 AM, teor wrote: > >> On 5 Oct 2016, at 18:10, >> wrote: >> >> We're back to IPS, which can drop the specific malicious traffic. >> I've been speaking with the lawyer few minutes ago. He told me >> that there is a pressure to put all the responsibility for the >> traffic to t

Re: [tor-relays] Tor and Diplomatic Immunity

On 09/04/2016 09:11 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > Do embassies and consulates run Tor nodes? AFAIK no studies have been > done on this, but diplomatic immunity and Tor would seem to be a match > made in Heaven. Well, they need uplinks, right? I doubt that diplomatic immunity forces ISPs to serve th

  1   2   >