Re: [tor-relays] "What fraction of the tor network by consensus weight are the openssl-vulnerable relays?"

2014-04-18 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote: > Making a separate thread so as not to pollute the challenger[1] one. > > Roger: you wanted to know (times are UTC if anyone cares), > > [22:08:35] [...] we now have a list of 1000 fingerprints, and we could >> pre

Re: [tor-relays] "What fraction of the tor network by consensus weight are the openssl-vulnerable relays?"

2014-04-09 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
of now, it says 'access denied', here's a copy: http://ravinesmp.com/volatile/ssltest.py Be careful running random scripts from the internet, of course. This whole thread is not meant to convey things in any kind of official capacity (quite the opposite.) > thanks! >

Re: [tor-relays] "What fraction of the tor network by consensus weight are the openssl-vulnerable relays?"

2014-04-08 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote: > Making a separate thread so as not to pollute the challenger[1] one. > > Roger: you wanted to know (times are UTC if anyone cares), > > [22:08:35] [...] we now have a list of 1000 fingerprints, and we could >> pre

Re: [tor-relays] Metrics for assessing EFF's Tor relay challenge?

2014-04-08 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Lukas Erlacher wrote: > >> Hi Kostas, >> >> right now, we're coding challenger against what exists in debian wheezy, >> which means version 0.1.2 of the requests lib u

Re: [tor-relays] Metrics for assessing EFF's Tor relay challenge?

2014-04-08 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Lukas Erlacher wrote: > Hi Kostas, > > right now, we're coding challenger against what exists in debian wheezy, > which means version 0.1.2 of the requests lib using the python-requests > package you mentioned, where response.json is correct, and not > response.jso

[tor-relays] "What fraction of the tor network by consensus weight are the openssl-vulnerable relays?"

2014-04-08 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
Making a separate thread so as not to pollute the challenger[1] one. Roger: you wanted to know (times are UTC if anyone cares), [22:08:35] [...] we now have a list of 1000 fingerprints, and we could > pretend those are in the challenge and use our graphing/etc plans on them > [22:08:45] they happ

Re: [tor-relays] Metrics for assessing EFF's Tor relay challenge?

2014-04-08 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > On 05/04/14 17:46, Lukas Erlacher wrote: > > Hello Nikita, Karsten, > > > > On 04/05/2014 05:03 PM, Nikita Borisov wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Karsten Loesing > >> wrote: > >>> Installing packages using Python-specific pack

Re: [tor-relays] Port 8118 Traffic?

2014-03-24 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Geoff Down wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014, at 12:55 AM, Dennis Crawford wrote: > > Hello - > > > > > > > > I just recently installed a Tor Relay and now I'm seeing a TON of port > > 8118 > > denied requests in my log. > ... > > Am I doing something wrong? > > N

Re: [tor-relays] ExtORPort notice

2014-02-15 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Delton Barnes wrote: > Upon upgrading obfsproxy to 0.2.6 and Tor to 0.2.5.1-alpha-dev > (git-f63b394d90583b77+96972c4) for scramblesuit, I got this in the Tor log: > > Feb 15 04:40:03.000 [notice] We are a bridge with a pluggable transport > proxy but the Extended

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Cloud: still not listed

2014-01-15 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Kostas Jakeliunas > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Patrick ZAJDA wrote: > >> > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> &g

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Cloud: still not listed

2014-01-15 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Patrick ZAJDA wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > I have set up an Amazon EC2 instance to run a Tor Relay, I chose > Obfsproxy Bridges. > > [...] > > The second point is: I looked at the configuration, and noticed bridge > is s

Re: [tor-relays] Running random web services on a bridge-server?

2013-11-16 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Nov 16, 2013 1:01 PM, "Martin Kepplinger" wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for being lazy, I'm not sure if I can figure it enirely out > myself: Is there _any_ implication on the status of a bridge in the Tor > network when I run random web services like an open website, xmpp > server, whatever, on the

Re: [tor-relays] Bad idea to switch from a relay to a bridge?

2013-11-14 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
Just to illustrate further, it's really easy to see if an IPv4 address was *ever* part of the network, e.g. look up current moria1's address: http://ts.mkj.lt:/details?search=128.31.0.34 So if a bridge was a relay once (under the same ip addr), implementing an additional check in GFW or wherev

Re: [tor-relays] Bad idea to switch from a relay to a bridge?

2013-11-14 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Nick wrote: > Hi, > > I've been running a very low bandwidth relay for a little while with > my home ADSL connection, but given the up speed is so poor, and > (more importantly) my ADSL provider has stopped switching my IP > about every 24 hours, I'd like to switc

Re: [tor-relays] onionoo

2013-09-02 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
The usual deal is to just wait a bit more, until your bridge gets voted into the last consensus. The "running: true/false" field in Onionoo simply indicates whether your bridge/relay descriptor is listed in the last consensus (which is published every hour, and includes a list of relays and bridges

Re: [tor-relays] efficiency and reachability

2013-08-27 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:11 PM, That Guy wrote: > > 1) have 4 extra unused devices, 2 android & 2 older laptops running > Xubuntu & Lubuntu that can run full time & my 2 primary > machines(android tab and Debian laptop). With only so much bandwidth, > what helps best in that situation? > a. few

Re: [tor-relays] Experience with obfuscated bridge on Raspberry Pi Raspian

2013-08-21 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:58 AM, z0rc wrote: > On 20/08/13 12:01, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote: > > Do you remember where you did hear this? Was it in writing, are you by > chance maybe able to link to it? It would be interesting to know more. > > > Hi, > > It was actual

Re: [tor-relays] Upgrading an obfsbridge to the latest alpha on git master, on raspberry pi

2013-08-21 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Maybe you should build .deb package from these sources? > https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian#source Ah! debuild && dpkg -i. Yes, that's the cleaner way to do it for sure, thanks. There's no reason why this shouldn't work with the la

[tor-relays] Upgrading an obfsbridge to the latest alpha on git master, on raspberry pi

2013-08-20 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
A few days ago, George posted an invitation for obfsproxy operators to upgrade their Tor software to the latest version on the master branch in the Tor git repo. [1] I'm running a low traffic obfsbridge on a raspberry pi, the whole thing is rather experimental in its nature already, so decided to

Re: [tor-relays] Experience with obfuscated bridge on Raspberry Pi Raspian

2013-08-20 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
Thanks for sharing your experience! > After the week I decided to shut the bridge down because I heard from people being contacted by the police even though only running a non-exit relay. Do you remember where you did hear this? Was it in writing, are you by chance maybe able to link to it? It wo

Re: [tor-relays] Raspberry Pi Relay Node Performance and future Plans on Documentation and more

2013-08-13 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:02:35 + > wrote: > > > I'm wondering, is there any other method for running a tor > > bridge/relay on > > the raspberry pi, other than downloading the source and compiling it > > yourself? > > Raspbian has it in t

Re: [tor-relays] Planningon running bridge with bw limitation - config help

2013-08-13 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote: > On 13.08.2013 08:02, Kali Tor wrote: > > I am actually in double minds about using obsproxy. Is there a demand > for it? > > Yes! Please do set up obfsproxy. Since obfsproxy bridges are usually really low traffic, I think the combination of

Re: [tor-relays] No disk space for new files created by Tor

2013-08-11 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:43:59 +0300 > Kostas Jakeliunas wrote: > > > Huh, curious why it fails to write stuff to disk. > > > > Does doing > > echo "something" > tempfile > > succe

Re: [tor-relays] No disk space for new files created by Tor

2013-08-11 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
Huh, curious why it fails to write stuff to disk. Does doing echo "something" > tempfile succeed? /var/log/tor is hogging diskspace indeed :) perhaps then do cd /var/log/tor sudo rm *.gz then do du -sh * to see if there are any remainder large files left there. On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:32 PM

Re: [tor-relays] No disk space for new files created by Tor

2013-08-11 Thread Kostas Jakeliunas
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:41 PM, TonyXue wrote: > > [...] > It seems that I've run out of space. But my VPS comes with 35GB disk space and it shouldn't be used up so fast. So how to deal with it? > If I do run out of space,any advice for deleting the old files of Tor? Are there any files created b