I can dedicate 2 more IP’s from my network to this. You just want it to be
obfs4 and iat-mode set to 2?
Thanks,
John C.
> On Aug 24, 2022, at 2:35 AM, elise.tora...@web.de wrote:
>
>
> As in the title, it took me over an hour to find one - for my security
> requirements, the timing and somet
Are you sure you are setting a private auto generated address that Ubuntu
changes so that you can’t be tracked?
Thanks,
John C.
> On Jan 19, 2022, at 1:49 AM, Quentin Campbell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a non-exit relay on a home British Telecom broadband connection
> (FTTC, 20Mb up/80M
Update your version of tor this is an old issue that has been fixed in the
latest version.
Thanks,
John C.
> On Jan 16, 2022, at 4:17 AM, AMuse wrote:
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> I'm operating a TOR Exit on dedicated hardware. The load average is low
> (0.07) and the network load is fine (120Mb/sec
Well, I have to say thanks to the update to tor 0.4.6.9 the DNS overload
issue is gone. My consensus Weight went down sightly due to the constant
overload flag. Lets see if time will help heal that.
Good work so far.
Thanks,
John C.
On 2021-12-21 07:39 AM, nusenu wrote:
bobby stickel:
I
I agree its kinda pointless if you know the issue already...
Thanks,
John C.
On 2021-12-16 08:41 AM, nusenu wrote:
To stop confusing operators it would make sense to remove the
"This relay is overloaded since"
banner from Relay Search for all tor versions prior to
0.4.6.9 and 0.4.7.3-alpha
Hello all,
I would have to agree on this it appears that the DNS failure timeout is
too low. I have more then enough bandwidth to host tor exit nodes, and
my own unbound full recursive relay and yet i still get the timeout
message 1-1.5%. Sometimes even weird amounts such as 40-50%.
I have be
Peter,
Thanks for the response that did the trick and got the system updated
fully.
Thanks,
John Csuti
+1 (216) 633-1279
On 2021-10-11 03:41 AM, Peter Gerber wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately, there is some software that wasn't well prepared for the
expiration of the Let's Encrypt root c
.
Error
Err:5 https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org focal Release
Certificate verification failed: The certificate is NOT trusted. The
certificate chain uses expired certificate. Could not handshake: Error
in the certificate verification. [IP: 95.216.163.36 443]
Thanks,
John Csuti
+1 (216
expected and encouraged.
Thanks,
John Csuti
+1 (216) 633-1279
On 2021-10-09 11:07 PM, sysmanager7 via tor-relays wrote:
Greetings All, I have three relays that are in need of an upgrade and
reboot.
What is the best way to restart these relays without loosing flags or
time?
Secondly how long
Hello,
First i would recommend updating your tor version then worrying about
your issue. Your current tor version is not recommended by the directory
authority's.
Thanks,
John Csuti
+1 (216) 633-1279
On 2021-10-09 06:40 PM, Keifer Bly wrote:
Hi,
So my relay at
I second this. We are in 2021 and a relay is considered fast if it is above
100KB/s...? I don’t think a later dialup service should be considered a fast
relay.
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 633-
> On May 25, 2021, at 4:18 AM, abuse department wrote:
>
> What year is it?
>
&
and the graphics is on board the CPU (Integrated intel graphics.)
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 633-
> On Apr 12, 2021, at 6:23 AM, mpan wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I am hosting 3 VM's limited at 10Mbps all together. Each VM is limited to
>> 1Mbps via proxmox. I hav
about half the connections.
Also my ISP has only used a fourth of the total connections. I am also working
with the renter of the VM’s to figure it out.
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 633-
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 11:05 AM, William Kane wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> if i have these relay
ry? I noticed
this happen over the past few months maybe its increased usage on the
relays not sure. According to TOR relay search the demand has spiked
recently. I wondering why/how it could bypass the limits on both proxmox
and pfsense.
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 633
Hello Netaudit,
I was having the same issue as you are currently. Check your IPv4 and
IPv6 some authority's are stating your relay is running and others are
not. My issue was i opened ports on IPv4 but not through IPv6. Please
check this and let me know what you find.
Thanks,
John
Interesting I’ll have to look into that. I am giving both IPv4 and IPv6 so that
could be the issue.
Thanks,
John Csuti
> On Oct 17, 2020, at 12:13 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, postmas...@coolcomputers.info
> wrote:
>> I was w
I am as well constantly getting emails about it from my ISP. As well as a few
companies... not sure why there ramping up. For now I setup a mail rule to
forward them to a different mailbox inside my email.
Thanks,
John Csuti
> On Jul 18, 2020, at 8:43 PM, John Ricketts wrote:
>
D0F2882D84450F47C3FC922D5F6A262AB1395D6D
On 7/8/2020 1:36 PM, gus wrote:
Dear Relay Operators,
Do you want your relay to be a Tor fallback directory mirror?
Will it have the same address and port for the next 2 years?
Just reply to this email with your relay's fingerprint.
Important: you have
Hey,
He is referring to the cpu not being fast enough it can’t make all the
calculations needed to run TOR fast enough. We are referring to the base clock
not your internet speed
Thanks,
John Csuti
> On Feb 11, 2020, at 11:39 PM, skarz wrote:
>
>
> 70 Mbps isn’t fast en
That is exactly what will happen you will become a normal middle relay
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 236-3309
https://www.coolcomputers.info/
> On Jan 27, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Mario Costa wrote:
>
> Thanks Jonathan, mpan and John.
>
> I still don’t understand what happens when the
The stable flag refers to your fingerprint being up for long lived circuits.
Being on a dynamic up won’t change that. So in principle the stable flag means
that the server is up and reach able for most of the time no matter what the
address or IP may be.
Thanks,
John Csuti
> On Jan 26, 2
First off that is not the issue at hand so stop! Also webmin is only accessible
from the inside or select remote IPs through my firewall. Once again the issue
at hand is the errors complaining about deb.torproject.org
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 236-3309
https://www.coolcomputers.info/
> On
Nope I have that installed. I know it is something wrong with let’s encrypt and
the CRL I have installed in the system. I’m just not sure how to fix it since
my system is up to date and my time is correct.
—John
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 8:20 AM, Matt Traudt wrote:
>
> On 1/6/20 04
$ sudo apt update
Hit:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Hit:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
Hit:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease
Hit:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
Ign:5 http://downlo
t not sure
what arguments to use.
- John
On 12/29/2019 6:44 AM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
On 27.12.2019 23:01, John Csuti wrote:
Hi Roger,
Thanks for the direction but I did a ping test on IPv6 and it came
back. I will look-into other possible issues as well and keep you
posted.
Your r
Hi Roger,
Thanks for the direction but I did a ping test on IPv6 and it came back.
I will look-into other possible issues as well and keep you posted.
- John
On 12/27/2019 3:51 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 09:22:29AM -0500, John Csuti wrote:
Hello,
I have ran a exit
Excellent.
Publishing server descriptor." I was also wondering maybe I screwed something
up in the config I could send a copy of my config if needed.
Thanks,
John Csuti
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 236-3309
https://www.coolcomputers.info/___
tor-relays m
Excellent.
Publishing server descriptor." I was also wondering maybe I screwed something
up in the config I could send a copy of my config if needed.
Thanks,
John Csuti
Thanks,
John Csuti
(216) 236-3309
https://www.coolcomputers.info/___
tor-relays m
28 matches
Mail list logo