Hello all,
I would have to agree on this it appears that the DNS failure timeout is
too low. I have more then enough bandwidth to host tor exit nodes, and
my own unbound full recursive relay and yet i still get the timeout
message 1-1.5%. Sometimes even weird amounts such as 40-50%.
I have been working with a few people on this issue and nothing we have
tried has fixed this. The other thing is that all other servers i run
have no issue with DNS timeouts. It appears to only be a TOR issue. I
would even say that some DNS queries that TOR makes are to taken down
sites, fake sites or non-existent domains.

Thanks,
John C.
+1 (216) XXX-XXXX
On 2021-11-08 06:25 PM, Anders Trier Olesen wrote:

Hi Ibex There's some discussion about this issue on #tor-relays. First of all, I actually don't think there's any problem with your Exit node. IMO 1.5% is expected and the current threshold is just too low (or the timeout too low). We're hosting some fairly high capacity exit nodes (around 100mbit/s each), generating about 100 DNS queries/sec in total. We're also seeing around 1.5% failed DNS queries. Here's what I think is going on: For some queries (1.5%?), the authoritative DNS servers for the requested domain are not responding. Recursive DNS resolvers are by default more patient than the Tor software. Eventually the recursive resolver will return a 'SERVFAIL' to Tor, but by then, Tor has already given up, and counts it as a timeout. One example of a domain that is currently (2021-11-08T23:40+01:00) failing to resolve because of its authoritative DNS servers being down is mzfgbh.com [2]. Try running `dig +trace +additional mzfgbh.com [2]` (for some reason, dig ignores the 'additional' section of one of the answers. Essentially the problem is that this query (and a few others) times out: `dig mzfgbh.com [2] @1.1.1.20 [3]`). On a related note, when this metric was introduced, we were seeing around 5-6% failed queries. The recursive DNS resolver we were using was hosted on the same IP as a guard node. Apparently many authoritative DNS servers block traffic from all Tor relays! The most extreme example of this I found, is that the authoritative DNS servers for the entire .by ccTLD (Belarus) are blocking DNS requests from guard and exit nodes. This resulted in all <domain>.by queries timing out! By moving our recursive DNS resolver to an IP not used by any Tor relays, the DNS timeouts fraction reported by Tor dropped from 5-6% to 1.5%. The Tor relay guide should recommend running your recursive resolver (unbound) on a different IP than your exit: https://community.torproject.org/relay/setup/exit/ - Anders Trier Olesen On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 5:53 PM Intrepid Ibex via tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> wrote:
Hi everybody, I am new to tor (as server operator) and try to support the network by operating an exit node. Machine is running Ubuntu 20.04 - Tor 0.4.6.8. nyx is giving me a notive every 10 minutes or so: [NOTICE] General overload -> DNS timeouts (6) fraction 1.4742% is above threshold of 1.0000% DNS on this machine however works perfectly. I told my tor browser to use my specific exit node, everything works fine. Node is running since 4 days now. Load is as expected. Thanks in advance for any help! Ibex
--
Sent using MsgSafe.io [1]'s Free Plan Private, encrypted, online communication For everyone. www.msgsafe.io [1] _______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Links:
------
[1]
https:/www.msgsafe.io/?utm_source=msgsafe&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=freemailsignature
[2] http://mzfgbh.com
[3] http://1.1.1.20
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to