Re: [tor-relays] Running an exit node from home

You can exit to one of (80,443) to at least a /8 to receive it.. So if you add an allow 443 on a not so populated /8, it will get the exit flag.. :-) > On 30 Oct 2018, at 17:30, Spiros Andreou wrote: > > Just a note that I believe you will lose the exit flag for not having at > least ports 80

Re: [tor-relays] VyOS in Tor Intensive Environments

Although not at 4-5 Gb/s but closer to 1 Gb/s Tor, plus a bit more from other things, mostly outgoing, I can tell VyOS works fine.. It’s basically the Linux kernel doing all the forwarding and it has iptables, so you should be fine if the hardware is capable.. > On 11 Oct 2018, at 07:38, Con

Re: [tor-relays] Cloudflare Onions Beta and Network Stability

at 08:56, Dave Warren wrote: > >> On 2018-08-20 15:39, DaKnOb wrote: >> HOWEVER, Cloudflare doesn’t need to hide their location. Everyone knows >> their servers. So they can use single hop Onion Services, and not the >> traditional three hop ones. >> That means

Re: [tor-relays] Cloudflare Onions Beta and Network Stability

Cloudflare had a post yesterday[1] on their blog[2] that said they have about 10,000,000 domain names using their service. So that’s a rough number of the maximum number of websites that will be made available over Tor. Now in reality I expect all their large customers to opt-out, unless it’s an

Re: [tor-relays] Monitoring multiple relays

It depends on what you consider “professional” monitoring. Do you mean information collected, or how was it collected? Is measuring something from the tor process using bash scripts and cron professional? Is measuring network traffic using Prometheus and plotting to Grafana professional? For a

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

Two IPs in the US, one is FiOS.. I'm thinking they didn't even bother to hide, but that may be the case, sure. The FiOS IP is static. > On 9 Feb 2017, at 08:19, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 02/08/2017 11:25 AM, DaKnOb wrote: >> So less than 24 hours after t

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

So less than 24 hours after the previous post and someone, mysteriously, subscribed the abuse mailbox to > 2,000 newsletters.. Of course I do not have proof nor am interested on who’s behind this and it didn’t cause any bad, just good (gave me plenty of data to research). Also, it seems every ti

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

Incidentally yesterday I published a blog post featuring them and why their abuse e-mails are plain spam: https://blog.daknob.net/security-companies-and-abuse-e-mails/ > On 08 Feb 2017, at 06:00, Andrew Deason wrote: > > I run an