On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, pa011 wrote:
> [WARN] Your server (x.x.x.x.:4443) has not managed to confirm that its
> ORPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and
> DirPort are reachable.
https://www.freebsd.org/releases/11.0R/announce.html
does not ship wit
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 10:51, Mirimir wrote:
>
> On 12/02/2016 02:13 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> On 12/02/2016 10:07 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote:
>>> I'm trying to stress some very small dedicated server with ViaNano
>>> and Atoms and would like to try out multiple Tor relay with A
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 10:46, Felix wrote:
>
> Is your ports tree up to date ? I saw you went for 0.2.9.4-alpha (depracted)
> on Dec 1st when a newer version was available. 'portsnap fetch update' does
> it.
There's a bad bug in this version that means it can drop off the
network, or fail to ke
On 12/02/2016 02:13 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 12/02/2016 10:07 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote:
>> I'm trying to stress some very small dedicated server with ViaNano
>> and Atoms and would like to try out multiple Tor relay with AES hw
>> acceleration to see the limits
> AFAIC ther
> Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are
reachable.
> What do I have to do - how to best set-up a decent strong firewall
on a freeBSD Exit?
If you run packet filter pf do you want to post the outputs to
'tor-relays' or better to 'lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/tor-bs
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 08:21, John Ricketts wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> Did you receive email from me directly to your gmail account?
>
> John
Hi John (and others),
I just emailed about a hundred relay operators individually, as well
as the ~1700 on this list.
I will respond to every reply I get.
Bu
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 09:42:34PM +0200, Rana wrote:
> I hope Tor developers or whoever runs the Tor project are reading this.
Only barely. :/ I bet most of them are unable to keep up with the madness
that this thread has become.
Please, I beg all of you, consider that there are 1700 busy people
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 08:51, Rana wrote:
>
> Wow, I cannot think of a way to check the max number of connections on my
> router. I do not believe that Pi has such limitation…
Every unix-based machine has such a limitation on each user.
It is normally called the maximum number of file descriptor
That was exactly my point, thank you Anemoi. This is the case all over the
world, not just in Germany. Unfortunately there seems to be a culture of
shooting the messenger here, or accusing him of being “aggressive”,
“accusatory”, “claiming entitlement” or (my favorite) “lacking programming
ski
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 02:55, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>
> On 4 December 2016 at 14:20, teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 22:18, teor wrote:
>>>
On 4 Dec. 2016, at 22:06, Pascal Terjan wrote:
On 4 December 2016 at 10:44, teor wrote:
> ...
>
> Your relay(s) can he
Wow, I cannot think of a way to check the max number of connections on my
router. I do not believe that Pi has such limitation...
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
teor
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 11:42 PM
To: tor-relay
(Please post under others' answers, it makes the discussion
read more clearly.)
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 08:43, Rana wrote:
>
> OK thanks, this is beginning to sound logical. What you are saying - correct
> me if I am wrong - is that since 3 DirAuths gave me fast/hsdir flags while
> the other 5 di
Nothing logical about it. Thats all you get with shitty connection
On Dec 4, 2016 1:43 PM, "Rana" wrote:
OK thanks, this is beginning to sound logical. What you are saying -
correct me if I am wrong - is that since 3 DirAuths gave me fast/hsdir
flags while the other 5 didn't and gave me poor wei
OK thanks, this is beginning to sound logical. What you are saying - correct me
if I am wrong - is that since 3 DirAuths gave me fast/hsdir flags while the
other 5 didn't and gave me poor weight, you believe that my connectivity with
the 5 auths is poor and this is the source of my trouble.
If
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 08:15, Rana wrote:
>
> My international connectivity is just fine, connection speed is stable at 1.5
> mbps and I have a Stable flag. Three authorities voted to give me HSDir and
> Fast. I have provided my Torrc. My consensus weight is stable for several
> days now, at 14
Perhaps this IS in fact normal. I ran a Tor relay on a Raspberry Pi for a
while. My speed was about 1Mbps max, similar to your 1.5Mbps. I saw minimal
traffic, and the consensus weight never went above 20.
I'm not running a relay at home anymore because of the slow speeds. The
configuration guide m
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 08:11, Rana wrote:
>
> 5kbit/s traffic and consensus weight of 14 after running for a month,
> including last 9 days with the same IP and a Stable flag - you consider this
> normal?
No, sorry, I explained poorly:
Your maximum bandwidth is as expected for a middle relay w
Tim,
Did you receive email from me directly to your gmail account?
John
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 04:45, teor wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Dear Tor Relay Operator,
>
> Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a
> fallback directory mi
On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 20:47:17 -
"Alan" wrote:
> Thanks for that, I've made changes to both torrc files.
> I've added MyFamily with each others finger print like so:
> MyFamily E856ABA2020AA9C483CC2D9B4C878D8D948B0887
You don't need to only list the other one(s) in each MyFamily, you could
simp
My international connectivity is just fine, connection speed is stable at 1.5
mbps and I have a Stable flag. Three authorities voted to give me HSDir and
Fast. I have provided my Torrc. My consensus weight is stable for several days
now, at 14.
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailt
The dollar sign is optional.
Find ExcludeNodes option description at:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en
> A list of identity fingerprints, country codes, and address patterns
of nodes to avoid when building a circuit. Country codes are 2-letter
ISO3166 codes, and must be wrapped
5kbit/s traffic and consensus weight of 14 after running for a month, including
last 9 days with the same IP and a Stable flag - you consider this normal?
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
teor
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 201
No all good just add them as you are tor adds a $ if you dont its not an issue
Cheers Mark B
> On 4 Dec 2016, at 20:47, Alan wrote:
>
> Thanks for that, I've made changes to both torrc files.
> I've added MyFamily with each others finger print like so:
> MyFamily E856ABA2020AA9C483CC2D9B4C878D
I've been trying to find the answer to $ prefix or not. I've just this
second added it to both. Maybe without it assumes it's a nickname.
> Good question some of mine are not but then I thought the fingerprint had
> to be prefixed with a $ sign? I dont see any errors in the log when I use
> $ or w
Thanks Netgear Ready for the constructive approach. Here is my torrc (nickname
redacted). There is no hidden service running on the Pi and no connections to
the transparent proxy (its respective wifi interface is down). The Pi is doing
nothing except the Tor relay, memory utilization 13%, CPU cl
Good question some of mine are not but then I thought the fingerprint had to be
prefixed with a $ sign? I dont see any errors in the log when I use
$ or without a $ sign?
Looking at Atlas the myfamily fingerprints seem to have a $ in front of them?
But in man pages it just says 'fingerprint' w
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 07:47, Alan wrote:
>
> Thanks for that, I've made changes to both torrc files.
> I've added MyFamily with each others finger print like so:
> MyFamily E856ABA2020AA9C483CC2D9B4C878D8D948B0887
>
> Then sighup'd both relays through arm.
>
> Do you know how long it takes Atla
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 07:44, Netgear Ready wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> Im not sure if I'm entitled to post here, but i think my contribution
> might be useful. I am running two relays on dynamic IPs which change
> about very 24hours, my advertised bandwidth is around 700KB/s,
> Actually used are around
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 06:16, Matt Traudt wrote:
>
> If you would like to see something change, it would be a good idea to go
> to https://trac.torproject.org, create an account (or use the
> cypherpunks one), and open a ticket stating facts such as
>
> - where you saw that the Tor Project saying
> On 5 Dec. 2016, at 02:39, Rana wrote:
>
>> For as little as $10.00 US there are VPS' with static ip's..
>
> Attn: Kurt Besig
>
> Well I kind o' like my Raspberry Pi that cost me $40 including box and power
> supply and SD card and door to door delivery, with far more horsepower and
> memor
Thanks for that, I've made changes to both torrc files.
I've added MyFamily with each others finger print like so:
MyFamily E856ABA2020AA9C483CC2D9B4C878D8D948B0887
Then sighup'd both relays through arm.
Do you know how long it takes Atlas to show the changes?
Alan
> Hi Alan,
>
> Family indicat
Hey,
Im not sure if I'm entitled to post here, but i think my contribution
might be useful. I am running two relays on dynamic IPs which change
about very 24hours, my advertised bandwidth is around 700KB/s,
Actually used are around 150KB/s which gives about 20% of the
advertised bandwidth. This ra
Ahh ok thanks Roger - I do have accounting max set
Cheers Mark B
> On 4 Dec 2016, at 20:22, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 06:06:40PM +, Sec INT wrote:
>> On all my relays and Exits I set Dirport as 80 but when I look at Atlas or
>> https://torstatus.blutmagie.de al
Hi Alan
If you have more than one relay you add the fingerprint of any other relay you
run to your torrc file - if say I ran 10 relays and exits there may be a chance
that you would route through just my servers thus you would not be anonymous as
I could follow you through from entry to exit.
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 06:06:40PM +, Sec INT wrote:
> On all my relays and Exits I set Dirport as 80 but when I look at Atlas or
> https://torstatus.blutmagie.de all of them bar one are showing 'none' as
> Dirport
Most likely your relay opted not to advertise its DirPort, for
example becaus
Hi Alan,
Family indicates they're all operated by the same person. as you run both
TheCosmos and MilkyWay, they are in the same family.
Please declare so in the .torrc.
Thanks!
On 4 Dec 2016 8:07 PM, "Alan" wrote:
In the UK it depends what ISP your on. Virgin Media gives out static ip's
as f
In the UK it depends what ISP your on. Virgin Media gives out static ip's
as far as i know. BT (what i'm using) is dynamic, the ip changes every
time the router reboots. It reboots when it detects a fault which is
normally between 2-4 weeks on average.
These are my relays:
TheCosmos (running on h
Am 04.12.2016 um 19:46 schrieb Rana:
> Paul, you may be a very, very smart dude who needs no clarifications and I
> may be a passive aggressive liberal fascist but you are totally wrong - I
> have NO idea what "submit a patch" means
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=submit+a+patch!
signature.asc
Descri
On 04.12.16 19:50, Rana wrote:
> Since when is there a requirement for a relay operator to have
> "programming skills"?
Who said there is? There is, however, an incentive (I'd even call it a
requirement) to be polite when posting on a public mailing list. An
accusatory or hostile tone is unlikely
Am 04.12.2016 um 20:24 schrieb ane...@tutanota.de:
> In Germany, it's quite usual that you have a dynamic IP and unusual that
> you have static IP. Not just a few relays are located in Germany. It's
> not just a question of frustration of owners of dynamic IP relay, but
> also a matter of bandwith
Am 04.12.2016 um 19:50 schrieb Rana:
> Since when is there a requirement for a relay operator to have "programming
> skills"?
This requirement does not exist.
But there if you want make tor behave differently than it does,
programming skills are welcome (but not necessary).
> [tor] should sa
In Germany, it's quite usual that you have a dynamic IP and unusual that you
have static IP. Not just a few relays are located in Germany. It's not just a
question of frustration of owners of dynamic IP relay, but also a matter of
bandwith waste. If Tor cannot handle dynamic IPs properly a lot
Rana
I don't think there's more anyone can do here. I think people here have
done a good job explaining _why_ you see what you see.
If you would like to see something change, it would be a good idea to go
to https://trac.torproject.org, create an account (or use the
cypherpunks one), and open a t
There isn't.
On Dec 4, 2016 12:50 PM, "Rana" wrote:
Since when is there a requirement for a relay operator to have "programming
skills"?
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of Ralph Seichter
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 8:40
Since when is there a requirement for a relay operator to have "programming
skills"?
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
Ralph Seichter
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 8:40 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re:
Paul, you may be a very, very smart dude who needs no clarifications and I may
be a passive aggressive liberal fascist but you are totally wrong - I have NO
idea what "submit a patch" means in whatever jargon you are using. Submit what?
To whom? Where? In what form?
-Original Message-
F
On 12/04/16 13:39, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 04.12.16 17:54, Rana wrote:
>
>> In short, if Tor Project does not want relays with dynamic IP, it
>> should say so and I would stop wasting my time.
>
> What's with the entitlement issues? You are free to contribute to the
> Tor project, but if you d
On 04.12.16 17:54, Rana wrote:
> In short, if Tor Project does not want relays with dynamic IP, it
> should say so and I would stop wasting my time.
What's with the entitlement issues? You are free to contribute to the
Tor project, but if you don't have the programming skills or the wish
to do so
Rana, I don’t think ""submit a patch" needs any clarification.
Maybe you are a little bit to aggressive in your wording :-) ?
I do have a dynamic IP as well on one relay and do know that frustration.
Relax
Paul
Am 04.12.2016 um 19:23 schrieb Rana:
> Please clarify what you mean by "submit a p
Please clarify what you mean by "submit a patch".
I am not one of Tor technical contributors, nor do I presume capability of
being one. I can only report my findings as a relay operator. Which I have
already done here, in full detail.
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-rel
Hi
On all my relays and Exits I set Dirport as 80 but when I look at Atlas or
https://torstatus.blutmagie.de all of them bar one are showing 'none' as
Dirport - also the one that does show Dirport 80 also has the V2Dir flag - does
this have something to fo with it?
If I look at the connections
Am 04.12.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Rana:
> In short, if Tor Project does not want relays with dynamic IP, it
> should say so and I would stop wasting my time. Otherwise, Tor
> should fix what's broken.
Please submit a patch.
Thanks.
Crying about what tor shold do to please you seems not very pro
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
Matt Traudt
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 6:20 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP
On 12/04/2016 10:39
With bandwidth rating of 14 [FOURTEEN] after 1 month of almost uninterrupted
presence, including last 9 days of absolutely stable performance and stable IP,
and with Stable flag and with Fast and HSDir votes from three DirAuths? Naah, I
do not believe this. Something is broken there and this so
On 12/03/16 12:13, diffusae wrote:
> Same as me ...
>
> AFAIK it depends on your settings in torrc.
>
> On 03.12.2016 18:02, nusenu wrote:
>> it will not write to /var/log/tor/
>> so I can not confirm George's observation and was wondering what version
>> he did observe the mentioned behavior.
H
On 12/04/2016 10:39 AM, Rana wrote:
>> For as little as $10.00 US there are VPS' with static ip's..
>
> Attn: Kurt Besig
>
> Well I kind o' like my Raspberry Pi that cost me $40 including box and power
> supply and SD card and door to door delivery, with far more horsepower and
> memory than
On 04.12.16 16:39, Rana wrote:
> I can think of many an Iranian or Turkish or Chinese or Russian
> dissident who could use 1.5 mbps bandwidth to communicate with the
> free world.
So just leave your relay running, and when other relays with better
connectivity and a higher consensus rate are satu
On 4 December 2016 at 14:20, teor wrote:
>
>> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 22:18, teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 22:06, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 December 2016 at 10:44, teor wrote:
...
Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a
fallback direc
>For as little as $10.00 US there are VPS' with static ip's..
Attn: Kurt Besig
Well I kind o' like my Raspberry Pi that cost me $40 including box and power
supply and SD card and door to door delivery, with far more horsepower and
memory than needed for running Tor relay, and my free and absolu
On 12/4/2016 1:03 AM, teor wrote:
>
>> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 01:06, Rana wrote:
>>
>> I have been running a relay with dynamic IP for a month now and quite
>> obviously my relay is severely punished for having a dynamic IP. The IP may
>> change once in several days (currently running over a week w
> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 22:18, teor wrote:
>
>> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 22:06, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>>
>> On 4 December 2016 at 10:44, teor wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a
>>> fallback directory mirror.[0]
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Please emai
> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 22:06, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>
> On 4 December 2016 at 10:44, teor wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Dear Tor Relay Operator,
>>
>> Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a
>> fallback directory mirror.[0]
>>
>
On 4 December 2016 at 10:44, teor wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Dear Tor Relay Operator,
>
> Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a
> fallback directory mirror.[0]
>
> These mirrors are hard-coded into tor's source code, like the dire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear Tor Relay Operator,
Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a
fallback directory mirror.[0]
These mirrors are hard-coded into tor's source code, like the directory
authorities. We have 80 fallbacks, but we want 200
Hi tornodes.io team,
first of all thanks for joining the tor network and running exit relays,
this is really appreciated!
To help protect tor clients please set the MyFamily parameter in your
torrc configuration, if you need help with that let us know.
Since managing MyFamily can be a painful ta
> On 4 Dec. 2016, at 01:06, Rana wrote:
>
> I have been running a relay with dynamic IP for a month now and quite
> obviously my relay is severely punished for having a dynamic IP. The IP may
> change once in several days (currently running over a week with the same IP
> and I just got my Sta
I have been running a relay with dynamic IP for a month now and quite
obviously my relay is severely punished for having a dynamic IP. The IP may
change once in several days (currently running over a week with the same IP
and I just got my Stable flag back again, about 3 weeks after losing it).
The
67 matches
Mail list logo
