On 07/06/2016 01:01 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> https://boingboing.net/2016/07/01/researchers-find-over-100-spyi.html
> "Many people fear that running an exit node will put them in police
> crosshairs if it gets used in the commission of a crime. For the
> record, Boing Boing runs a very high-capacity
On 07/06/2016 01:09 PM, Green Dream wrote:
> Except the operators at BoingBoing have the privilege of corporate
> liability (instead of personal liability), and very likely corporate
> counsel (i.e., a nice legal team) as well.
>
> It seems easier to say "don't worry about it, it's not really a
That's my thought as well. At any rate, not using a cache for DNS queries
would add even more latency to the network.
On Jul 9, 2016 10:01 AM, "Petrusko" wrote:
>
> It shouldn't affect unbound's ability to cache anything. However, I
> personally think it is inappropriate to run a DNS cache on an
> It shouldn't affect unbound's ability to cache anything. However, I
> personally think it is inappropriate to run a DNS cache on an exit
> node, because that preserves a record on the exit node of what people
> are using it for.
>
> zw
Hey,
I'm not an Unbound expert, I think Unbound doesn't log
> On 9 Jul 2016, at 19:00, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> I'm just curious, why at my exit relay the bandwidth is constantly around 8
> MByte/sec in both directions with a 2-3% higher value for the inbound bw
> whereas the amount of incoming packets is 25% and more higher more tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm just curious, why at my exit relay the bandwidth is constantly around 8
MByte/sec in both directions with a 2-3% higher value for the inbound bw
whereas the amount of incoming packets is 25% and more higher more than the
outgoing packet amount
