I only got 1 abuse complaint, but I also only ran a Tor node for about a
month with a reduced exit policy. I explained that I was running a Tor
exit node, told them I blocked the offending address, and then linked to
the Tor Project website for more info. They thanked me for my time, and
marked
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 09:30 PM, Michael Armbruster wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> assuming the default HTTP port, it was an attack to the port 80.
> Furthermore, the cryptic looking signs (%XX, whereas X is 0-9 or A-F),
> are url escaped characters. Unescaping them leads to something like this:
>
>
Hello,
Thanks for running an exit relay.
That is just an automated email message. You do not want to reply to
every single automated message you receive, firstly because these
replies go into a black hole and they are not read by any humans, so
your effort may be useless.
Generally, you should on
On 2016-06-17 at 22:12, pa011 wrote:
> Thank you Michael, solving that obviously easy question :-)
>
> So what was this "attac" then about, on which way, how can I see that ?
>
> Nice weekend to all
>
> Paul
>
>
> Am 17.06.2016 um 21:53 schrieb Michael Armbruster:
>> On 2016-06-17 at 21:51, pa
Thank you Michael, solving that obviously easy question :-)
So what was this "attac" then about, on which way, how can I see that ?
Nice weekend to all
Paul
Am 17.06.2016 um 21:53 schrieb Michael Armbruster:
> On 2016-06-17 at 21:51, pa011 wrote:
>> Thank you both !
>>
>> @ Michael: that’s exa
On 2016-06-17 at 21:51, pa011 wrote:
> Thank you both !
>
> @ Michael: that’s exactly what I did so far and in the past
> @ Moritz: I will try my best - yes it was an automated response with
> just an name in Germany and no IP given, that I could possibly block
>
> "HTTP/1.1 404 293..." are the
Thank you both !
@ Michael: that’s exactly what I did so far and in the past
@ Moritz: I will try my best - yes it was an automated response with
just an name in Germany and no IP given, that I could possibly block
"HTTP/1.1 404 293..." are these the ports the traffic went trough ?
Am 17.06.
On 06/17/2016 09:35 PM, pa011 wrote:
> As I am new to this business could somebody please give me a hint how to
> best handle such an abuse complain - possibly stop it?
You can explain Tor, offer to block that destination from your exit, and
offer your help so they can treat Tor users differently
Hello,
I generally respond using the templates on this page:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorAbuseTemplates.
Generally the abuser has already stopped or is connected to a new exit node
by the time you get a message.
Hope that helps!-- Michael CanningPresident - Ca
As I am new to this business could somebody please give me a hint how to
best handle such an abuse complain - possibly stop it?
Thanks, Regards and a nice weekend.
we have detected abuse from the IP address xxx.xxx.xxx,xxx, which
according to a
whois lookup is on your network. We would appreciat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/06/16 13:25, nusenu wrote:
>> Because my OS vendor has no Tor packages.
>
> The torproject provides RPM packages for Fedora and RedHat/CentOS.
> Fedora has tor packages, on CentOS EPEL is available.
>
> So you are using torproject RPMs on
> Because my OS vendor has no Tor packages.
The torproject provides RPM packages for Fedora and RedHat/CentOS.
Fedora has tor packages, on CentOS EPEL is available.
So you are using torproject RPMs on non-Fedora/CentOS? (if you don't
mind: On what OS are you using the torproject RPMs?)
signatu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/06/16 23:08, nusenu wrote:
> (forwarding a question from tor-dev since here are probably more
> ops that might want to answer the question bellow)
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-June/011073.html
>
> Dear tor-relay oper
13 matches
Mail list logo