On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> Like I noted in my reply to Paul S. if there was a way to
> measure/quantify trust, or deal with the "people's Guards just
I'd agree that randomly handing off nodes is bad.
And that there may be cases where structured handoff
among operators
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:03:31 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> I have decided to spin up some more servers, and this should postpone
> the need to turn off any of the relays by at least 3 weeks (at the
> cost of an increased burn-rate, i.e. now they all will expire sooner
> and "all at once").
Ok. Ha
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 05:32:17 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:47:23 +
> isis wrote:
>
> > I could take those backdoored^W"pre-warmed" keys and put them to good use!
>
> Mkay, I'll get in touch in a few days.
Hello,
I have decided to spin up some more servers, and this
AS does not indicate location.
Live BGP AS does not necessarily indicate ownership
at registrar, though any proxying effectively pools them.
A relay IP shouldn't be in more than one AS at
once, though it may shift around many over time.
dig doesn't really work via tor :(
__
