x27;s framework, and in many aspects is more
Avalon than Avalon itself, as both came from the Jserv effort.
Now that Turbine is working on using Avalon (also FOP, POI, and others),
IMHO it would be excellent to also have the talented Tomcat developers
work together with us.
--
Nicola Ken
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm committing a draft for a Tomcat 5 proposal.
>>>
>>> It is a draft, so it is not in final form yet (it needs
tage, I'll post again.
> So +0.1
> to work nice with Avalon, but -1 for basing the architecture on Avalon.
We'll talk about this when we've finished our spring-cleaning.
Could you kindly summarize the things that Avalon needs to do before you
would even consider taking i
seems to me like: Avalon is too good to be of any use.
If it were a bit more "hacky" I would use it.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>
>>Remy, I hear you.
>>Current Avalon is what you say.
>>Next Avalon will be what it was supposed to be in the first place.
>
>
> I think next avalon should start by looking for a
ri Gomez ___[_]
> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
the goals of 5.0 ).
>
>
> +1.
>
>> Christopher: I think we should add your requirement for performance
>> testing to the proposal. In fact, we should add a whole section about
>> testing for 5.0. Would this satisfy you ?
>
>
> +1 to start a new commons sub
ant's ProjectHelper hook to plug in
> different jndi config drivers ?
OT: I am. I may use it to make Morphers available to apps. *And* if you
tell me about your Antlib 'experiment', I'd be more than happy :-)
-> switching conversation to private or ant-dev
