Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm committing a draft for a Tomcat 5 proposal.
>>>
>>> It is a draft, so it is not in final form yet (it needs feedback for
>>> that).
>>>
>>> I'm attaching the document to the mail, in case people don't want to
>>> checkout the repository.
>>
>> What about using Avalon as a framework?
>> This way we would have a unified server environment, and reusable
>> server components.
>
> -1.
> (I'm tired of replying to this)
I'm sorry, wasn't aware that I would cause distress.
I searced in the archives of tomcat-dev with "Avalon" and couldn't find
recent answers on this topic.
> Avalon is the contrary of flexibility, so it will not be considered (at
> least not by me).
Avalon is a project, not the contrary of flexibility.
Tomcat is a project too, and AFAIK it wants to be usable in different
environments.
Taken that you are against using Avalon directly, I don't want to table
a discussion with you on it.
When you'll want to take another look at Avalon and give us suggestions,
you're welcome.
Anyway, for my personal information, what's the current status of this?
What's the plan for T5?
List: tomcat-dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CatalinaBlock.java
From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2001-02-12 11:29:53
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> For these reasons, I'd like to see an official Avalon wrapper
> introduced in Tomcat 4.1, but not in Tomcat 4.0. I also
> propose to remove the current Avalon wrapper from the Tomcat
> 4.0 repository, to avoid the maintenance related issues.
Thank you.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
