On Thursday 24 October 2002 08:15 pm, Warner Onstine wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:50 PM
> Subject: Re: mavenize tomcat
>
>
> > FYI
Hi,
>personally, didn't find it very challenging to download the 4.1.13
source
>distribution (to a machine behind a firewall), and configure it to
build
>including the optional libraries. I really *don't* want to be forced
to
>download nMB of code to do what I can do with a couple of minutes with
- Original Message -
From: "Warner Onstine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: mavenize tomcat
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Costin Manolach
- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: mavenize tomcat
> Warner Onstine wrote:
>
> > So, If I can get significant developer buy-in I would be will
> From: news [mailto:news@;main.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:51 AM
>
> Warner Onstine wrote:
>
> > So, If I can get significant developer buy-in I would be
> willing to cut a
> > version or two of the maven project descriptor for those of
> us who w
Warner Onstine wrote:
> So, If I can get significant developer buy-in I would be willing to cut a
> version or two of the maven project descriptor for those of us who would
> like it to be easy again ;-). If not, that's fine.
As long as you don't change build.xml or the gump descriptors - I'm
ok
Hi all,
Let me just explain a few things first:
1) I stopped checking out Tomcat from CVS the minute I had to download or
check out in concert with (the servlet-api) more than five files and had to
setup so many properties that the build refused to run. The time commitment
was not worth it to me, s
