----- Original Message ----- From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:50 PM Subject: Re: mavenize tomcat
> Warner Onstine wrote: > > > So, If I can get significant developer buy-in I would be willing to cut a > > version or two of the maven project descriptor for those of us who would > > like it to be easy again ;-). If not, that's fine. > > As long as you don't change build.xml or the gump descriptors - I'm > ok. With the new Maven, it isn't necessary, it now only uses Ant under the covers with Jelly and Werkz tags doing the work with the POM (Project Object Model). > > FYI, tomcat5 does have a 'download' target that gets you all the > jars, and an 'update' that gets you all the cvs repositories that > you need. That's what I use, and it's not that bad ( even if slow ) Interesting, sounds like it is duplicating what Maven can do as it stores all the jars in a common repository. -warner > > > -- > Costin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
