Re: server.xml DTD/Schema

2001-12-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote: > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:02:01 +0100 > From: Mika Goeckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: server.xml DTD/Sche

Re: server.xml DTD/Schema

2001-11-30 Thread Mika Goeckel
A first cut of dtd and schema are reviewable under: http://www.mikagoeckel.de/tomcat/server.html, http://www.mikagoeckel.de/tomcat/server.xsd http://www.mikagoeckel.de/tomcat/server.dtd I've thrown all possible attributes for the different classes into the tag, so this is nothing more than to v

Re: server.xml DTD/Schema

2001-11-30 Thread Mika Goeckel
ester would moan. Mika - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:09 AM Subject: Re: server.xml DTD/Schema > One thing to remember is that it is n

Re: server.xml DTD/Schema

2001-11-29 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
One thing to remember is that it is not technically possible to write a DTD for server.xml that covers all possible cases (and I suspect that's true for Schema as well). Consider the following cases: * Elements like and let you define which implementation class you want, from the set of choi

Re: server.xml DTD/Schema

2001-11-29 Thread Mika Goeckel
H I've been too fast with this announcement, I need some help. I've got a problem with Connector (and other cases). I miss a concept like interface in XML Schema. A Connector might be of different types: HTTP/1.1 Connector HTTP/1.1 Connector with SSL support Warp Connector and others mi