Hmmmm.... I've been too fast with this announcement, I need some help.
I've got a problem with Connector (and other cases). I miss a concept like interface in XML Schema. A Connector might be of different types: HTTP/1.1 Connector HTTP/1.1 Connector with SSL support Warp Connector and others might come in the future. All of these three connectors have different attributes, but the XML colloquial definition name all of them simply <Connector>. There is no way to check for 'required' if we simply just throw all possible attributes in the dtd/schema definition, because some are mutual exclusive. Does anybody have a clue how to solve that? My suggestion would be to clean up the XML and define proper elements for different purposes which might result in some coding work... Mika ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mika Goeckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:01 AM Subject: server.xml DTD/Schema > Hi, > > I've built a first version of a DTD/Schema for server.xml and would ask if > someone would like to review it? > > I would prefer the Schema, because it allows more checking, but I haven't > seen a parser which checks against schemes, so I created a DTD from it as > well. > > As this is quite a bunch of lines, please hands up who wants to receive it. > > Cheers, Mika > > P.S.: The initial cut is from the docu, I plan to go through the source > tomorrow to recheck. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
