On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Ian Darwin wrote:
> For one thing I don't think a LOT of people actually specify the buffer size
> (of course those who DO will jump in to prove me wrong, and those who
> don't will remain silent :-)).
>
> For another, memory is getting bigger quickly, and having sizes of th
On June 11, 2002 10:19 pm, you wrote:
> There are plenty of JSP1.1 pages out there, this will require people to
> rewrite the pages just to add a 'kb' suffix ( which is pretty weird
> by itself, almost everything else uses k, and is redundant - if
> the size can only be specified in kb, there is n
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Bill Barker wrote:
> > The JSP1.1 ( and previous jaspers ) didn't require that ( AFAIK ), so
> > that would brake backward compat. It'll also brake a lot of pages.
> >
>
> Unfortunately, Kin-Man is correct that the kb is required in JSP-1.2.
>
>
> The size can only be spec
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:59 PM
Subject: jasper2: @page buffer syntax
> One more ( today is my jaspers day :-):
>
> in Validator.PageDirectiveVisitor, there is a check for the syntax of
