On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > > The JSP1.1 ( and previous jaspers ) didn't require that ( AFAIK ), so > > that would brake backward compat. It'll also brake a lot of pages. > > > > Unfortunately, Kin-Man is correct that the kb is required in JSP-1.2. > > <spec-quote section="2.1"> > The size can only be specified in kilobytes, and the suffix "kb" is > mandatory. > </spec-quote>
Well, maybe the spec needs to be fixed then. It is also mentioned in the spec that it is backward compatible with JSP-1.1, and AFAIK the suffix was not mandatory - even in the spec there is an example without kb at the end. There are plenty of JSP1.1 pages out there, this will require people to rewrite the pages just to add a 'kb' suffix ( which is pretty weird by itself, almost everything else uses k, and is redundant - if the size can only be specified in kb, there is no reason to require the suffix ). Since tomcat4.0 doesn't seem to require this ( AFAIK ), people will have to edit their pages even if they keep using the same jsp version. Seriously, can anyone point to any reason for this ?? I'm just curious, I assume there was some tought into it - and I fail to see what. Any JSP expert around ? Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
