On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
> Costin, thanks for the further details. Rather than a higher
> level discussion (followed by me spending more time running
> benchmarks, followed by more high-level discussion), could
> could you give a pointer to where you posted your resu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Let me know when you have the results with the writer.
>
Costin, thanks for the further details. Rather than a higher
level discussion (followed by me spending more time running
benchmarks, followed by more high-level discussion), could
could you give a pointer to w
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
> - I chose the test based on Costin's feedback of the sort of tests
> he was using[1]. I may be a suspicious SOB, but I strive to be an
Actually, I sugested the ServletOutputStream because it avoids the
char->byte conversion and allows
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
> MinTC is included for comparison, since it uses the 4.0.3
> HTTP connector but attempts to improve the Catalina side
> of things. It's sort of the converse of the 4.1
> Connector improvements. But it's not finished so it's not
> really a fa
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> So to summarize, the old connector *may* look ok in very specific synthetic
> benchmarks (you chose the right one; I hope you didn't choose that one to
> try to prove that Coyote sucks, or something like it), but actually, it has
> (big) issues. All these could be refact
> I'm getting unusual preliminary results on some
> performance tests against a very simple servlet, and
> I'd like to see what results other people get. If
> you're going to run the tests yourself, don't look at
> my results ahead of time if you can resist (they're at
> the bottom of the message
> I'm getting unusual preliminary results on some
> performance tests against a very simple servlet, and
> I'd like to see what results other people get. If
> you're going to run the tests yourself, don't look at
> my results ahead of time if you can resist (they're at
> the bottom of the message
