On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > MinTC is included for comparison, since it uses the 4.0.3 > HTTP connector but attempts to improve the Catalina side > of things. It's sort of the converse of the 4.1 > Connector improvements. But it's not finished so it's not > really a fair comparison. Think of it as an upper bound on > where relatively unsophisticated Catalina optimizations > can get you.
Couldn't resist, I looked at the results :-) That shows 2 things: - that optimizations in coyote will improves performance - that optimizations in catalina will improve performance As Remy pointed out, the 'OutputStream' is an ideal case for the old connector - the writer and the char->byte conversions are one of the most important optimizations in coyote. If you could try with a writer and send the results - that would be instructive. ( well, to make me happy - try it with 3.3 too :-) Another interesting test would be MinTC with coyote. Costin > > 4.0.3 4.1.X MinTC > > 0k/8 881 960 1059 > 1k/8 855 916 1010 > 8k/8 719 732 767 > 16k/8 520 533 532 > 32k/8 319 320 320 > > > Ignore the absolute numbers, yours will be very different. > (I'm too lazy to normalize them). I'll hold off on > conclusions until I get some feedback about whether other > people are getting similiar results (or if my test setup > was a little too preliminary) > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
