[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe this can't be a 'consensus' vote - at least the proposal
> for the code organization was a 'majority' vote with multiple
> choices.
>
> This is how the repository was organized before, xml.apache.org
> is doing the same for SAX and DOM an
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> on 7/17/02 3:50 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As I said, xml.apache.org is packaging 3 APIs from 3 different and
> > unrelated sources in a single repo and jar ( DOM, SAX, JAXP ), and
> > that was discussed and aproved by
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:30:05 -0700
> From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Missed vote
>
>
on 7/17/02 3:50 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I said, xml.apache.org is packaging 3 APIs from 3 different and
> unrelated sources in a single repo and jar ( DOM, SAX, JAXP ), and
> that was discussed and aproved by both xalan and xerces communities.
Those 3 api's are co
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> We are also talking about the next version of the Servlet API (5.0) which is
> based on the work of JSR 154...not JSR 053. JSR 154 is specific to the
> Servlet API and is not working on JSP. So, it no longer makes sense to have
> the two together fo
on 7/17/02 2:47 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so I'm
> -1 on spliting them up unless the JSR expert groups decide
> so.
As Craig mentioned on the JSR 154 list, this isn't a JSR decision and I
wasn't talking about splitting the jar's up...Sun can distribute whatever
they w
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> > Until the JSP 2.0 spec is changed, it make less sense for us to
> > have two separate repos. (It just make more sense to put
> > javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagInfo with javax.servlet classes).
>
> They can be in separate repo's with the same packa
on 7/17/02 1:30 PM, "Kin-Man Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sympathetic to Jon's view on separating servlet and JSP API
> and repositories.
>
> One result of the separation would make it likely that package names
> for JSP 2.0 API may change. JSP2.0 is now in public review, so it may
l the JSP 2.0 spec is changed, it make less sense for us to
have two separate repos. (It just make more sense to put
javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagInfo with javax.servlet classes).
> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 20:28:43 +0200
> From: Paulo Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Miss
For what is worth, I think Jon is 100% right on this one.
And he was cristal clear about the reasons too.
Regards,
Paulo
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:43 AM
> To: tomcat-dev
> Subject:
on 7/16/02 1:14 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's so painful about a ten-line build.xml target that creates a
> separate JAR file with just the javax.servlet and javax.servlet.http API
> classes, if that's what you need?
>
> Sharing a CVS repository has little or noth
Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:56:40 -0700
>> From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:56:40 -0700
> From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Missed vote
>
> Arg. I missed the vote where the Servlet API
13 matches
Mail list logo
