On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:30:05 -0700
> From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Missed vote
>
> on 7/17/02 2:47 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > so I'm
> > -1 on spliting them up unless the JSR expert groups decide
> > so.
>
> As Craig mentioned on the JSR 154 list, this isn't a JSR decision and I
> wasn't talking about splitting the jar's up...Sun can distribute whatever
> they want...I'm talking about splitting the repo's up. If you want to make
> the build system produce a single .jar file from the two repo's then that is
> fine.
>
The same works in reverse -- setting up one repository that only creates
two separate JARs is perfectly feasible :-).
> We are also talking about the next version of the Servlet API (5.0) which is
> based on the work of JSR 154...not JSR 053. JSR 154 is specific to the
> Servlet API and is not working on JSP. So, it no longer makes sense to have
> the two together for the next revision of the Servlet API.
>
> 2 API's, 2 JSR's, 2 CVS repo's.
>
> We are at a -1 stalemate. Should we involve the Jakarta PMC now?
>
I don't see where the stalemate is.
The original proposal that you're voting against had approximately 12 +1s
and the voting was closed on schedule. Retroactively opposing something
that already passed doesn't seem likely to accomplish anything. You might
want to make a formal proposal to change the previous decision.
As a PMC member, I can tell you what my comment would be if it came up
there -- "go tell TOMCAT-DEV to figure it out".
> -jon
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
