ent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:20 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement
Costin Manolache wrote:
> iasandcb wrote:
>
>
>>Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does
>>JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepan
oul Project Coordinator
http://jakarta.apache-korea.org
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:15 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Costin Mano
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> iasandcb wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK
>>> 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4
>>> and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together.
>>
>>
>>
>> Actu
Costin Manolache wrote:
> iasandcb wrote:
>
>
>>Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK
>>1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4
>>and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together.
>
>
> Actually, it isn't.
>
> All we know is
On 5/10/02 12:43 am, "Mark Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has been brought to my attention that some members of the Tomcat
> community have expressed a desire to see a requirement lower than J2SE
> 1.4 in JSP 2.0.
Great... One more reason to start thinking about kicking JSP out of the
doo
Costin Manolache wrote:
>Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
>
>
>>>If the EG prefers features over portability - then we need to find a
>>>way to create a distribution without JSP ( is this possible ?) and maybe
>>>compensate by including cocoon or velocity.
>>>
>>>
>>Personally, I would support 1
My opinion is that being cross platform (IBM VM, JRockit (BEA), etc.) is
very important and making it required using Sun VM (1.4) is not a good idea.
Until there are other VMs that are 1.4, there must be a workaround (add
these JARs to make 1.3 work).
.V
Mark Roth wrote:
> It has been brou
The spec defines a conforming JSP 2.0 implementation as one that runs on JDK
1.4. A JSP author may therefore assume the new API's are available when
creating their webapp. It's a serious issue for, say, Oracle, or IBM, who has
a custom Java VM.
But, I hadn't noticed that Apache is bundling JD
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> If the EG prefers features over portability - then we need to find a
>> way to create a distribution without JSP ( is this possible ?) and maybe
>> compensate by including cocoon or velocity.
>
> Personally, I would support 1.3 (and 1.2 assuming you are willing to
> down
Costin Manolache wrote:
> iasandcb wrote:
>
>
>>Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK
>>1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4
>>and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together.
>
>
> Actually, it isn't.
>
> All we know is
iasandcb wrote:
> Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK
> 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4
> and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together.
Actually, it isn't.
All we know is that the current draft has this requireme
Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK
1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4
and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together.
At this point, I'd like to propose an idea. It's "Tomcat subprojects"
plan.
So far, Tomcat has had
12 matches
Mail list logo
