Re: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-15 Thread Punky Tse
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > > I've defined HAVE_UNIXSOCKETS, and i'm making the ifdefs with that it > > seems to me a little better, i think that not having unix sockets ( at > > least with that name :) maybe is more common than only win32?.. > > That's fine. The goal is

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-12 Thread costinm
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > Mostly compiling, i about to commit in half of an hour.. > > How to deal with content-length apr_off_t? here is defined as __int64, > and code is using int and unsigned, and i got a warning about precision > lost, maybe use apr_off_t where now is u

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 12 de abril de 2002 16:32 > > Same here. Since I'm not a windows user I'll wait for your > code. Let me > know how I can help. > Mostly compiling, i about to commit in half of an hour.. How to deal with content-length

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-12 Thread costinm
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > This way there is no need to ifdef unix sockets, thanks :)), but it's > done now ;), so should i commit this change? Of course. FYI - I'm cleaning the jni worker now ( I want to have all components in a working state before a beta release for

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 12 de abril de 2002 16:32 > bit on linux ). You can exclude channel_apr_socket completely > on windows, > for socket you can use the old channel_socket. > This way there is no need to ifdef unix sockets, thanks :)), but

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-12 Thread costinm
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > I've defined HAVE_UNIXSOCKETS, and i'm making the ifdefs with that it > seems to me a little better, i think that not having unix sockets ( at > least with that name :) maybe is more common than only win32?.. That's fine. The goal is to be able to

RE: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 12 de abril de 2002 1:46 > > I think it's a good workaround - I hope those will be included in APR > and we'll remove the ifdefs. > I've defined HAVE_UNIXSOCKETS, and i'm making the ifdefs with that it seems to me a litt

Re: Building mod_jk2 for Win32

2002-04-11 Thread costinm
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > Hola a todos: > > I'm in the process to have a build of mod_jk2 for Win32, modiying needed > build.xml files aling the way, i imagine that unix domain sockets stuff > need , needs to be ifdefed for win32, i'm right? > > Are there more things that