There was a bug in mod_jk in versions up to 3.2b5 (I think). The effect was
that the server name was passed to tomcat instead of the hostname derived
from the HTTP request. This meant that the wrong host was used in 302 and
304 redirections.
Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: René Sa
René Salle wrote:
> I suspect my previous mail on the subject included somewhat incorrect
> assertions but I delete mails that are not worth keeping... ;-)
>
> Anyway, what's might be worth mentioning is that we use mod_jk, and AFAIK,
> that's the way Tomcat gets the host name it uses for redirec
