There was a bug in mod_jk in versions up to 3.2b5 (I think). The effect was
that the server name was passed to tomcat instead of the hostname derived
from the HTTP request. This meant that the wrong host was used in 302 and
304 redirections.
Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: René Salle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 November 2000 14:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Absolute URLs on redirections
>
>
> I suspect my previous mail on the subject included somewhat incorrect
> assertions but I delete mails that are not worth keeping... ;-)
>
> Anyway, what's might be worth mentioning is that we use
> mod_jk, and AFAIK,
> that's the way Tomcat gets the host name it uses for
> redirections and not
> through conf files. (I'm definitely not an expert on this.)
>
> I agree that Tomcat must send back absolute URL as stated in
> 14.30 of RFC
> 2616, but maybe is there still an issue pending about which
> server name it
> should uses to ensure smooth functioning including behind NAT.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
