Re: AJP using APR

2005-06-16 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: The biggest problem in JNI ( and probably - in Java playing nice with other languages and the rest of the platform ) is the objects and buffers moving around almost randomly. Yes, it may improve a bit the garbage collection speed - so people can create millions of garbage ob

Re: AJP using APR [T20050613001A]

2005-06-12 Thread business
Dear tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org, Thanks for writing to Webshots! We received your message on 6/12/2005. Your tracking number for this message is : T20050613001A ** IMPORTANT: PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL! ** This is an automatic response to let you know that your Webshots Corporate ema

Re: AJP using APR

2005-06-12 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 5:31 PM Subject: Re: AJP using APR Bill Barker wrote: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Ba

Re: AJP using APR

2005-06-12 Thread Costin Manolache
Bill Barker wrote: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Barker wrote: If I understand you correctly, you want MsgAjp to use ByteBuffer instead of byte []. At the cost of never supporting JDK 1.3 ever again, this would probably actually improve

Re: AJP using APR

2005-06-10 Thread Bill Barker
"Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bill Barker wrote: >> >> If I understand you correctly, you want MsgAjp to use ByteBuffer instead >> of byte []. At the cost of never supporting JDK 1.3 ever again, this >> would probably actually improve the perf

Re: AJP using APR

2005-06-10 Thread Costin Manolache
Bill Barker wrote: If I understand you correctly, you want MsgAjp to use ByteBuffer instead of byte []. At the cost of never supporting JDK 1.3 ever again, this would probably actually improve the performance of ChannelSocket (after changing it to use a blocking SocketChannel). The biggest

Re: AJP using APR

2005-06-09 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: So, where is it already? Some of use want to see how you can beat Costin ;-). Right now, I'm not planning on beating anyone, it's just my crap work code (which doesn't actually work yet). I haven't benched anything, and my experience with AJP is very limited. I used the

Re: AJP using APR

2005-06-08 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:42 AM Subject: AJP using APR Hi, I'd like to add my WIP code for AJP based on APR. It's not done yet, but it would be convinient to have the code there, just