Bill Barker wrote:
If I understand you correctly, you want MsgAjp to use ByteBuffer instead
of byte []. At the cost of never supporting JDK 1.3 ever again, this
would probably actually improve the performance of ChannelSocket (after
changing it to use a blocking SocketChannel).
The biggest difference will be if it's a 'direct' buffer, i.e. zero
copy. Classpath ( gcj, kaffe, etc ) also has byte buffer support - so
it should be ok, if anyone needs jdk1.3, they can use the old code.
But where is the code ?
Costin
Rémy
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above
as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is
PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you
may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent
through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or
sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers,
personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary
(unencrypted) e-mail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
