*Wipes brow*
ok, I'll gracefully run away from this one then ;-)
-Thom
Amy: deb packages for JDK1.3 (blackdown jdk) at
deb http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.blackdown.org/java-linux/debian/ woody non-free
HTH
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:28:32 +0900, Takashi Okamoto said:
> > I didn't know much a
> I didn't know much about debian packaging but there is a tool, alien,
which
> convert from RPM to dpkg.
Alien isn't complete.
Because policies are different between Redhat and Debian.
Stefan is prepareing tomcat package for Debian.
Check here.
http://master.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat/
-
> I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
> challenge to keep it quite as up-to-date as CVS. Perhaps a regular
> "stable" release for Debian unstable and a nightly build for those of
> us
> who like pain?
I didn't know much about debian packaging but there is a tool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Costin, could you please move your upload directory for these nightly builds to
> > someplace else? The problem is that you're confusing the people who wonder why
> > the nightly builds have nothing to do with the current (3.2) code release.
>
> I can move them t
> What about spliting the package - /opt/tomcat for the JARs,
> /var/log/tomcat for tomcat logs, /home/httpd/webapps for webapps ?
Up to redhat 6.2, /home/httpd was the serverroot. Config goes
to /etc/httpd/conf and misc logs in /var/log/httpd.
> It would be nice to have a standard - what are t
>
> Costin, could you please move your upload directory for these nightly builds to
> someplace else? The problem is that you're confusing the people who wonder why
> the nightly builds have nothing to do with the current (3.2) code release.
I can move them to tomcat-3.3 - I wanted to avoid con
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> > > a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> > > own"?
> >
> > I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
> > challenge to keep it quite
> > I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> > a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> > own"?
>
> I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
> challenge to keep it quite as up-to-date as CVS. Perhaps a regul
>
> /opt is reserved ReadOnly on many systems. Debian boys told me that
> packages should go to /var/x and java stuff /usr/share/java .
>
> Java software on Linux is not really standard now.
What about spliting the package - /opt/tomcat for the JARs,
/var/log/tomcat for tomcat logs, /home/
I would like to see a debian package of Tomcat.
However, I'd also like to see a debian 1.2+ JDK *laugh*
Amy!
> -Original Message-
> From: Thom May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 05:24:01 +, Andrew Savory said:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Thom May wrote:
>
> > I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> > a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> > own"?
>
> I'd love to see up-to-date Debian pa
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Thom May wrote:
> I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> own"?
I'd love to see up-to-date Debian packaging, but I think it would be a
challenge to keep it quite as up-to-dat
Hi Henri,
on a similar note, I am currently beginning the long road into
the Debian project. I have already stated that I wish to take
over the packaging for Cocoon, and am currently debating whether to try
to do Tomcat as well. I would be interested in hearing from
folks here whether they perciev
>As a Linux user I would be more than happy to see this happen. RPM is a
>great tool that makes installing and maintaining a linux box
>very easy.
That's the goal ...
>My +1 on that, my only wish/concern is related with the
>locations of the
>files ( I have a very strong preference to /opt -
As a Linux user I would be more than happy to see this happen. RPM is a
great tool that makes installing and maintaining a linux box very easy.
My +1 on that, my only wish/concern is related with the locations of the
files ( I have a very strong preference to /opt - it allows multiple
versions
Hi,
I just want to launch a poll to all tomcat commiters and latter
extends to jakarta.apache.org and xml.apache.org projects commiters.
As you may know I allready release RPM for the majority of the new
Apache Projects.
May be it will be time to 'Institutionalize the RPM Creation Process' as
16 matches
Mail list logo
