Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a écrit :
+1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk.
You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-)
Heu, the idea is to make jk2 (native2) apr mandatory.
We'll keep jk as it is today.
And I was thinking yo
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> Now that jk seems stabilized a bit, should we focalize on jk2 ?
>
> For instance I added some features to jk (ping/pong) which should be
> ported to jk2.
>
> Also I wonder if APR is mandatory for jk2.
>
> I'd like to use APR as a facade to all Operating Syst
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Gomez
>
> Mladen Turk a écrit :
> > +1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk.
> > You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-)
>
> Heu, the idea is to make jk2 (native2) apr mandatory.
>
> We'll keep jk as it is today.
>
And I was thi
I'm +1 on moving jk2 (native2) to APR. I haven't had a lot of time to play with jk2,
but I have seen that there are some issues with it on NetWare (something about it
allocating stuff when Apache 2 initializes it's 1st load and then expecting that stuff
to still be around when it comes up for r
jean-frederic clere a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Mladen Turk a écrit :
+1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk.
You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-)
Heu, the idea is to make jk2 (native2) apr mandatory.
We'll keep jk as it is today.
* the plan
- update jk2 (native2)
Henri Gomez wrote:
Mladen Turk a écrit :
+1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk.
You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-)
Heu, the idea is to make jk2 (native2) apr mandatory.
We'll keep jk as it is today.
* the plan
- update jk2 (native2) to use APR only
- port jk add-o
Mladen Turk a écrit :
+1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk.
You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-)
Heu, the idea is to make jk2 (native2) apr mandatory.
We'll keep jk as it is today.
* the plan
- update jk2 (native2) to use APR only
- port jk add-ons like ping/pong to j
+1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk.
You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-)
MT.
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Gomez
>
> Hi to all,
>
> Now that jk seems stabilized a bit, should we focalize on jk2 ?
>
> For instance I added some features to jk (ping/pong
+1 to have a version of mod_jk rewritten to use APR for all OS stuff
It would be best to use the version of APR which is distributed with
the current Apache 2 release so that there are no conflicts when using
mod_jk with Apache 2.
Requiring APR would allow using a global connection pool for the so
