Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Ahh, OK, I understand. Can we make the version in build.xml be
something like 1.0 then, so that no user can confuse it for the latest
build?
Well, the in build.xml
also reflects the builded distributions.
For example if the 'dotted=5.5.0.0' the 'version name' would
be 5.5
tember 03, 2004 10:56 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: [5.5] Using dotted version naming
>
>Shapira, Yoav wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> The x.x-dev is a placeholder in build.xml. The Release Manager adds
>> version=a.b.c to his/her build.properties when doing a rele
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
The x.x-dev is a placeholder in build.xml. The Release Manager adds
version=a.b.c to his/her build.properties when doing a release, thereby
overriding the placeholder x.x-dev value. This is a common convention
not just for Tomcat, but for almost every open source project
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
The x.x-dev is a placeholder in build.xml. The Release Manager adds
version=a.b.c to his/her build.properties when doing a release, thereby
overriding the placeholder x.x-dev value. This is a common convention
not just for Tomcat, but for almost every open source project
sage-
>From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 10:46 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: [5.5] Using dotted version naming
>
>Shapira, Yoav wrote:
>> Hola,
>> I'm 0 on it. I think we (and numerous other projec
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hola,
I'm 0 on it. I think we (and numerous other projects, large and small) have been
doing fine with a.b.c, and a.b.c.d is overkill. But if it's automated, and we keep
using a.b.c for normal releases and use a.b.c.d only for patches, then it's OK.
Well, we actually have a
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I meant automated in the sense that there's something like
in jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml to provide a good default. So we already have the automation I mentioned, it's nothing fancy ;)
I'm disappointed ;)
I was already having grand plans about how this could represent
aucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 9:17 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: [5.5] Using dotted version naming
>
>Shapira, Yoav wrote:
>
>>Hola,
>>I'm 0 on it. I think we (and numerous other projects, large and smal
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hola,
I'm 0 on it. I think we (and numerous other projects, large and small) have been doing fine with a.b.c, and a.b.c.d is overkill. But if it's automated, and we keep using a.b.c for normal releases and use a.b.c.d only for patches, then it's OK.
You mention "if it's au
ennium Research Informatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 7:30 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: [5.5] Using dotted version naming
>
>Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I was wondering if we can adopt some version naming like
consisting of 4 digit groups.
I don't see any benefits, other that forcing Yoav to recompile the
installer all the time ;)
Well, when rolling out any release, this still has to be
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I was wondering if we can adopt some version naming like
consisting of 4 digit groups.
I don't see any benefits, other that forcing Yoav to recompile the
installer all the time ;)
Well, when rolling out any release, this still has to be done.
Whether the na
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I've just bumped on a installer problem caused by the
fact hat the current tomcat version has changed to '5.5-dev'.
I was wondering if we can adopt some version naming like
consisting of 4 digit groups.
Something like:
A.B.C.D
A.B are product major and minor (so 5.5).
If the
13 matches
Mail list logo
