Deacon Marcus at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> We're down to weeks now ... I personally consider Tomcat 4.0 to be in
>> maintenance mode (with a need to improve the documentation that there are
>> already volunteers working on, and continued work on the web connectors
>> which are vital to many u
Hi,
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Deacon Marcus wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm using (very ligthly) modified Tomcat 4.0 b5 for almost as
> long as it was
> > out (b3 before, but I'm not sure), and found it rock-stable so
> far, not a
> > single failur
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Deacon Marcus wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using (very ligthly) modified Tomcat 4.0 b5 for almost as long as it was
> out (b3 before, but I'm not sure), and found it rock-stable so far, not a
> single failure on neither development or deployment servers. While there're
> much feature
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Funny thought about version numbering...
>
>
> I highly dout your windows machine crashes every 4 hour
I highly dout your windows machine crashes every 4 hours on average.
- Original Message -
From: "Deacon Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 3:29 AM
Subject: Funny thought about version numbering...
> Hi,
Hi,
I'm using (very ligthly) modified Tomcat 4.0 b5 for almost as long as it was
out (b3 before, but I'm not sure), and found it rock-stable so far, not a
single failure on neither development or deployment servers. While there're
much features I would like Tomcat to have, what's already in is per
