Hi,
I'm using (very ligthly) modified Tomcat 4.0 b5 for almost as long as it was
out (b3 before, but I'm not sure), and found it rock-stable so far, not a
single failure on neither development or deployment servers. While there're
much features I would like Tomcat to have, what's already in is perfectly
stable for me. So why have 6th beta in a row, instead of declaring b5 final
and naming b6 4.1? That would definitely encourage more people to use it
instead of out-dated 3.2/3.3. Hell, I have now Tomcat _beta_ running for
about a month now (on RedHat 7.1, if you want to know), while my Windows
_final_ with every possible service pack and security patches crashes about
every 4 hours on average. I love you guys :) If such programmers would work
in M$ since its begging we would had (stable) Windows XP in 1985-1990.
Greetings, deacon Marcus