Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-20 Thread Costin Manolache
>> OTOH, I don't think this should be the case, and I think we should >> stop/start the server socket in that particular case, as was done in the >> old HTTP connector: One thing to consider here - the CHUID case, where you bind on 80 and then change the user id. You can stop the server socket,

Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-20 Thread Michael Smith
Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Bill Barker wrote: > > > I don't remember anything like that for 3.3.x (and nothing even close is > > open in BZ). But, then again, I don't imagine that very many people > > try and > > use the Http10Connector in production, and Coyote is only available in the > > night

Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-20 Thread Bill Barker
t: Saturday, October 19, 2002 5:59 AM Subject: AW: Bug 13736 > Bill, Remy, > > I have seen this one once on our production system > running Tomcat 3.3.1 with AJP1.3, Apache 1.3.27, mod_jk 1.1.0 > This is on Sparc Solaris 8 running JDK 1.3.1_04. > 11019 is our ajp13 port (whic

Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-20 Thread Hans Schmid
]> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 5:59 AM Subject: AW: Bug 13736 Bill, Remy, I have seen this one once on our production system running Tomcat 3.3.1 with AJP1.3, Apache 1.3.27, mod_jk 1.1.0 This is on Sparc Solaris 8 running JDK 1.3.1_04. 11019 is our ajp13 port (which we uswe also as sh

AW: Bug 13736

2002-10-19 Thread Hans Schmid
) Cheers, Hans > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@;apache.org] > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2002 20:15 > An: Tomcat Developers List > Betreff: Re: Bug 13736 > > > Bill Barker wrote: > > > +1. As I said above, it proba

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13736] - Socket closed unexpectedly

2002-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: +1. As I said above, it probably hasn't shown up in 3.3 mostly because AJP13 has many fewer accepts. I'll fix it then. You have to be careful that no IOException should end up in that code, otherwise, for each one the server socket will be restarted (not good). With HTTP/1

Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-18 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:17 AM Subject: Re: Bug 13736 > Bill Barker wrote: > > > I don't remember anything like that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13736] - Socket closed unexpectedly

2002-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13736] New: - Socket closed unexpectedly

2002-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13736] - Socket closed unexpectedly

2002-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: I don't remember anything like that for 3.3.x (and nothing even close is open in BZ). But, then again, I don't imagine that very many people try and use the Http10Connector in production, and Coyote is only available in the nightly for 3.3 until 3.3.2 comes out. o.a.t.u.net.