> Ok, first change.
>
> Would it be ok with you if I just drop Ajp14Packet in jk, and use the
> "plain" ByteChunk, plus a Ajp14Marshall to implement the marshaling on
> top of ByteChunk ?
>
> The idea is that ( someday - soon I hope ) ByteChunk will be able ( via a
> Liaison or the o.a.t.util.co
Ok, first change.
Would it be ok with you if I just drop Ajp14Packet in jk, and use the
"plain" ByteChunk, plus a Ajp14Marshall to implement the marshaling on
top of ByteChunk ?
The idea is that ( someday - soon I hope ) ByteChunk will be able ( via a
Liaison or the o.a.t.util.compat ) to int
