> Ok, first change.
>
> Would it be ok with you if I just drop Ajp14Packet in jk, and use the
> "plain" ByteChunk, plus a Ajp14Marshall to implement the marshaling on
> top of ByteChunk ?
>
> The idea is that ( someday - soon I hope ) ByteChunk will be able ( via a
> Liaison or the o.a.t.util.compat ) to interoperate with nio, and I want to
> keep all communication around the buffers ( to make my life easier when I
> do that ).
>
> It would also help simplify the code.
>
i have no problem with that. could that be done with ajp13 too??
> Another issue ( I already mentioned it ) - can we make Ajp14 independent,
> and remove the Ajp13 code from j-t-c/../tomcat33 ( the implementation from
> the main tree will remain and be used until Ajp14 is ready ) ?
>
some thoughts... seems like the right place for core ajpXX (1.3 and 1.4
for now) stuff is in org.apache.ajp, and only
adapter/connector/interceptor code should be in o.a.a.tomcatXX. i guess
i'm not quite clear on what your intentions are... are you only talking
about removing the ajp13 interceptor stuff from o.a.a.tomcat33?
> I'm now able to authenticate, there are few problems after that - but I
> hope tommorow I'll be able to use Ajp14 for most things. It's looking very
> good ( I still can't believe how easy it was to build ! )
>
> Costin
