Dan Milstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice to have this dicussion on tomcat-dev. I do think I have a
> useful understanding of mod_jk to offer, but I'm not going to be in France
> (and I'm not on the private thread)...
>
> Not that we have to have that conversation now, but I wo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, maybe a better place to meet would be tomcat-dev, isn't it ?
>
> I'm sure Dan Milstein would enjoy a French vacation ( I would ), but
> so far mod_jk was developed by a larger group on tomcat-dev. Dan and Henri
> are doing most of the work m
>> That's what I've been telling Gomez in a private thread,
>we're going to meet
>> later in April somewhere in the French alps with a BIG whiteboard...
>
>Well, maybe a better place to meet would be tomcat-dev, isn't it ?
Sure.
>I'm sure Dan Milstein would enjoy a French vacation ( I would ),
>> >That's what I've been telling Gomez in a private thread, we're
>> >going to meet later in April somewhere in the French alps with
>> >a BIG whiteboard...
>
>If there is enough snow, make that:
>
> riding (snow)boards over BIG white (stuff) ...
I must admit that even if I live in Sav
It would be nice to have this dicussion on tomcat-dev. I do think I have a
useful understanding of mod_jk to offer, but I'm not going to be in France
(and I'm not on the private thread)...
Not that we have to have that conversation now, but I would like to be
involved when/if it happens.
-Dan
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] New Committer: Amy Roh
> X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N
>
> >That's what I've been telling Gomez in a private thread, we're
> >going to meet later in April somewhere in
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I still think it would be a good idea to merge mod_jk and mod_webapp, even
> > if Pier is not going to touch 3.x code. Some of the ideas are good, and
> > getting them into mod_jk will be good for
>That's what I've been telling Gomez in a private thread, we're
>going to meet later in April somewhere in the French alps with
>a BIG whiteboard...
And a big piate di pasta.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still think it would be a good idea to merge mod_jk and mod_webapp, even
> if Pier is not going to touch 3.x code. Some of the ideas are good, and
> getting them into mod_jk will be good for the users - and that's what
> matters.
That's what I've
>Yeah, I was working for one... With another Tomcat committer,
>and thank god
>that Sun is _really_ serious about Tomcat, because if it was
>for some other
>company, right now my Apache involvement would be somewhere
>between a trash
>bin and the toilet...
I also works in a little company, SLI
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'll be +1 if Amy contribute to ALL TOMCAT current projects :
> >
> > ie : Tomcat 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 4.0
>
> Sweetie... I'm not going to touch ONE LINE of the 3.x code... Now, do you
Bravo !
That's
Amy Roh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First of all, I would like to thank to everyone who voted +1 for me becoming a
> committer. I am very excited to get involved in such a project and am very
> happy that I no longer need to bug Craig or Remy to commit my code for me. :-)
Whoh!!! :) Now
GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll be +1 if Amy contribute to ALL TOMCAT current projects :
>
> ie : Tomcat 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 4.0
Sweetie... I'm not going to touch ONE LINE of the 3.x code... Now, do you
want to take away my committers privilege?
IS EVERYONE GETTING NUTS AGAIN ARO
Dan Milstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please, please, please, let's not get into another debate about 3.x vs 4.x
> -- I am really enjoying this list being useful again, and not clogged with
> flame wars.
But flame wars are "FUN" :) :) :) Joking of course
Pier (on a plane to Dublin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> and I would love to see more people working for other companies in jobs
> involving tomcat and willing to become commiters, and this vote will make
> it easier for them to do so.
Yeah, I was working for one... With another Tomcat committer, and t
Every person who like to help make tomcat a better
product is really welcome.
>Has every committer for this project been contributing to ALL
>TOMCAT current
>projects? Personally, I don't quite understand the need for
>contribution
>to *EVERY* branch of tomcat from an EACH committer nor the
First of all, I would like to thank to everyone who voted +1 for me becoming a
committer. I am very excited to get involved in such a project and am very
happy that I no longer need to bug Craig or Remy to commit my code for me. :-)
And for response to Gomez "Personal to Amy, are you agree wor
Ok ok ok ok
+1
End Of Debate.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even a nasty (ex) flame warrior like me agrees 100% with this.
=;o)
Paulo Gaspar
> -Original Message-
> From: Of Dan Milstein
>
> ...
>
> I strongly disagree -- if Amy is going to focus on 4.x, I think that's
> absolutely fine. We don't need every developer to work on all three
> branch
> >Sounds good -- I looked through the archives and found the
> >messages which I had missed.
> >Thanks for clearing that up -- I'll happily
> >convert to +0 (I still don't feel like I've seen enough of
> >her changes myself to vote +1, but
> >it looks like plenty of other people have, which is
+1
Welcome aboard, Amy.
Dr. Mel Martinez
G1440, Inc.
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun,
> and has contributed
> several documentation updates and new tests for the
> test harness. She
> would like to work on bug fixes, as
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dan Milstein wrote:
> I have to say that I am a bit uncomfortable with this. The guidelines on
> the website say (http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html):
>
> "Developers who give frequent and valuable contributions to a subproject of
> the Project can have their status
+1
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] New Committer: Amy Roh
>
>
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has
>Sounds good -- I looked through the archives and found the
>messages which I had missed.
>Thanks for clearing that up -- I'll happily
>convert to +0 (I still don't feel like I've seen enough of
>her changes myself to vote +1, but
>it looks like plenty of other people have, which is great).
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: lunes 12 de marzo de 2001 21:19
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: [VOTE] New Committer: Amy Roh
>
>
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Serv
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dan Milstein wrote:
> Sounds good -- I looked through the archives and found the messages which I
> had missed. Thanks for clearing that up -- I'll happily convert to +0 (I
> still don't feel like I've seen enough of her changes myself to vote +1, but
> it looks like plent
Sounds good -- I looked through the archives and found the messages which I
had missed. Thanks for clearing that up -- I'll happily convert to +0 (I
still don't feel like I've seen enough of her changes myself to vote +1, but
it looks like plenty of other people have, which is great).
Going ahea
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has contributed
> several documentation updates and new tests for the test harness. She
> would like to work on bug fixes, as well as participate in the development
> of better admin tools, primarily on the
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has contributed
> several documentation updates and new tests for the test harness. She
> would like to work on bug fixes, as well as participate in the d
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has contributed
> several documentation updates and new tests for the test harness. She
> would like to work on bug fixes, as well as participate in the development
> of better admin tools, primarily on the
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has
> contributed
> several documentation updates and new tests for the test harness. She
> would like to work on bug fixes, as well as participate in the
> development
> of better admin
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has
> contributed
> several documentation updates and new tests for the test harness. She
> would like to work on bug fixes, as well as participate in the
> development
> of better admin
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dan Milstein wrote:
> I have to say that I am a bit uncomfortable with this. The guidelines on
> the website say (http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html):
>
> "Developers who give frequent and valuable contributions to a subproject of
> the Project can have their statu
I have to say that I am a bit uncomfortable with this. The guidelines on
the website say (http://jakarta.apache.org/site/roles.html):
"Developers who give frequent and valuable contributions to a subproject of
the Project can have their status promoted to that of a "Committer" for that
subprojec
Amy has recently joined the JSP/Servlet team at Sun, and has contributed
several documentation updates and new tests for the test harness. She
would like to work on bug fixes, as well as participate in the development
of better admin tools, primarily on the Tomcat 4.0 code base.
Votes please?
C
35 matches
Mail list logo
