White,
> But would it be a nice idea to use Log 4J through out tomcat?
no, we want to preserve the abstraction level provided by commons-logging,
which provides support for log4j in addition to other logging
packages.
Jan
> comments..
> Jan Luehe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Jasper currently use
But would it be a nice idea to use Log 4J through out tomcat?
comments..
Jan Luehe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Jasper currently uses its own private logging
facility implemented
in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
+1
-- Jeanfrancois
Jan Luehe wrote:
Jasper currently uses its own private logging facility implemented
in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
(by leveraging the commons-logging package).
Proposal is to remove org.
+1
I strongly echo Jan Luehe.
Jan Luehe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Jasper currently uses its own private logging
facility implemented
in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
(by leveraging the commons-logging package)
Jan Luehe wrote:
Hans,
Jasper currently uses its own private logging facility implemented
in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
(by leveraging the commons-logging package).
Proposal is to remove org.apache.jasper
Jasper currently uses its own private logging facility implemented
in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
(by leveraging the commons-logging package).
Proposal is to remove org.apache.jasper.logging, and replace calls
Hans,
> > Jasper currently uses its own private logging facility implemented
> > in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
> > the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
> > (by leveraging the commons-logging package).
> >
> > Proposal is to remove org.apache.ja
Jan Luehe wrote:
> Jasper currently uses its own private logging facility implemented
> in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
> the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
> (by leveraging the commons-logging package).
>
> Proposal is to remove org.apache.jas
Jan Luehe wrote:
Jasper currently uses its own private logging facility implemented
in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
(by leveraging the commons-logging package).
Proposal is to remove org.apache.jasper.logging,
Jasper currently uses its own private logging facility implemented
in the org.apache.jasper.logging package. This is inconsistent with
the way the other Tomcat subsystems perform logging
(by leveraging the commons-logging package).
Proposal is to remove org.apache.jasper.logging, and replace calls
10 matches
Mail list logo
