RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Jim Seach
--- "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > De: Jim Seach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: jueves 7 de marzo de 2002 18:08 > > > > > A new feature, but a suggestion rather than a request. Even if the > > client realm doesn't support Digest authentication, we can > > use B

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: Jim Seach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves 7 de marzo de 2002 18:08 > > A new feature, but a suggestion rather than a request. Even if the > client realm doesn't support Digest authentication, we can > use Basic or > Form to get the user ID and password in the clear, then

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread John Gregg
all, john -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] g]On Behalf Of Jim Seach Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:38 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout Ignacio, I apologize for not reading more

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Jim Seach
--- "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > De: Jim Seach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: jueves 7 de marzo de 2002 16:38 > > > > > Ignacio, > > > > I apologize for not reading more closely. You didn't -1 it, just > > And i apologize everybody for writing english so bad

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: Jim Seach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves 7 de marzo de 2002 16:38 > > Ignacio, > > I apologize for not reading more closely. You didn't -1 it, just And i apologize everybody for writing english so bad :), > expressed your opinion. I agree your proposed changes would

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Jim Seach
Ignacio, I apologize for not reading more closely. You didn't -1 it, just expressed your opinion. I agree your proposed changes would be much more flexible. Another option that might be nice would be the ability to specify a user supplied class to compute a password hash so only the hash needs

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: Jim Seach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves 7 de marzo de 2002 14:16 > > Ignacio, > > Forgive me if I don't understand, but it appears you are saying that > JDBCRealm's use of a sub-optimal table design is *flexible* because > there are ways in some databases to modify a cor

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Jim Seach
Ignacio, Forgive me if I don't understand, but it appears you are saying that JDBCRealm's use of a sub-optimal table design is *flexible* because there are ways in some databases to modify a correct schema (by adding a view) to make it work with JDBCRealm? It seems to me in this case that it is

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-07 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: John Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: miércoles 6 de marzo de 2002 15:26 > provided, but I consider it an improvement nonetheless because I value > flexible designs. I would expect the MySQL users to a flexible design is what you get in JDBCREalm, dont misinterpret me, the

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-06 Thread Bojan Smojver
7;ll confine myself to > ordinary bug fixes and not design "improvements." > > john > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > g]On Behalf Of Ignacio J. Ortega > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:43 PM > To: 'T

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-06 Thread John Gregg
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] g]On Behalf Of Ignacio J. Ortega Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:43 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout ( Syntax aprox

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-05 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: John Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: martes 5 de marzo de 2002 20:11 > I don't see how views will solve this problem. I'm not so > much concerned > with reading user and role data as I am with updating it. > Somehow the two > tables need to be linked by some common identi

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-05 Thread John Gregg
opers List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout Why do not use simply a views, instead of real tables..?? This way you doesnt need to do any changes in JDBCRealm to be able to use whatever column you like to join roles and users t

RE: [PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-05 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: John Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: martes 5 de marzo de 2002 1:27 > in the layout of one's users and roles tables. The current > implementation > (1.20) assumes the roles table will have a column with the > same name and > meaning as the username column in the users tabl

[PATCH] change JDBCRealm to add flexibility in table layout

2002-03-04 Thread John Gregg
Hi all. I'd like to propose a change to JDBCRealm to allow a little more flexibility in the layout of one's users and roles tables. The current implementation (1.20) assumes the roles table will have a column with the same name and meaning as the username column in the users table. In general,