> De: John Gregg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: miércoles 6 de marzo de 2002 15:26
> provided, but I consider it an improvement nonetheless because I value > flexible designs. I would expect the MySQL users to a flexible design is what you get in JDBCREalm, dont misinterpret me, the db design you've been proposing is the "Right One" :) I'm not discussing that, but i think flexible design is the one that lets you achieve your goals without modiying the code, i'm achiving your goals without modifying the code, ergo the Actual JDBCRealm is flexible enough to suit your needs, hence proved the first hypotesis.., JDBCRealm is flexible enough already :) Do you want, finally, to solve some flaws in MySql, as the lack of views? well not a problem, but is something that is very bad for my taste ( and my taste was modelled after some of our local gurus) Anyone has other comments? Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
