Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > Well, j-t-c/utils is more our core buisness. Since 4.0 or the connectors > > don't duplicate the code like 3.3 does, I'd say I don't like the idea too > > much. > > Or we can put them there, still keep the current ones, and start using the > > one

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread costinm
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Well, j-t-c/utils is more our core buisness. Since 4.0 or the connectors > don't duplicate the code like 3.3 does, I'd say I don't like the idea too > much. > Or we can put them there, still keep the current ones, and start using the > ones from the co

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> The idea in jakarta-tomcat-service is to implement JSR96 > >>> (http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp). &g

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > Well, the Java code looks very similar to me. So the native code could > > easily be ported to j-t-s. > > It's just that this code is 100% Tomcat-dependency free. So since it's some > > generic capability other projects could want, I proposed to m

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread costinm
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Well, the Java code looks very similar to me. So the native code could > easily be ported to j-t-s. > It's just that this code is 100% Tomcat-dependency free. So since it's some > generic capability other projects could want, I proposed to move it to t

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The idea in jakarta-tomcat-service is to implement JSR96 >>> (http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp). >>> jakarta-tomcat-4.

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
> "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The idea in jakarta-tomcat-service is to implement JSR96 > > (http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp). > > jakarta-tomcat-4.1/service is to allow run tomcat on port 80 as a daemon... > > The

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The idea in jakarta-tomcat-service is to implement JSR96 > (http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp). > jakarta-tomcat-4.1/service is to allow run tomcat on port 80 as a daemon... The Apache Software Foundation is voting NO

RE: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Well, the Java code looks very similar to me. So the native code could >easily be ported to j-t-s. >It's just that this code is 100% Tomcat-dependency free. So >since it's some >generic capability other projects could want, I proposed to >move it to the >commons, instead of leaving it as a hidd

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
he commons, there's already a "services" component. To avoid > > creating confusion, I suggest renaming the "service" component to > > "commons-daemon". > > > > Comments ? > > The idea in jakarta-tomcat-service is to implement JSR96 > (htt

Re: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread jean-frederic clere
, I suggest renaming the "service" component to > "commons-daemon". > > Comments ? The idea in jakarta-tomcat-service is to implement JSR96 (http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp). jakarta-tomcat-4.1/service is to allow run tomcat on port 80 as a daemon... Porting it to jaka

[4.1] Service

2002-02-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, There's a hidden component in Tomcat 4 named "service" (package is org.apache.service), which has almost nothing to do with Tomcat (except it was written by Pier and started its life here). The most current version of it (which is *not* the one used by Tomcat, BTW) resides in the jakarta-tomc