Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Christopher Cain wrote:
> >
> > I was thinking that maybe we could actually start running Tomcat
> inside the
> > kernel process itself. It worked for IIS ...
>
> Where IIS stands for: Internet Infected Server.
haha ... I like that one. I'll have to
Christopher Cain wrote:
>
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> >
> > > What are the main advantages to using an in-process VM as opposed
> > > to an out-of-process VM bridged over some form of IPC (like
> > > mod_webapp/mod_jk/mod_jserv)?
> >
> > Well, us
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > What are the main advantages to using an in-process VM as opposed
> > to an out-of-process VM bridged over some form of IPC (like
> > mod_webapp/mod_jk/mod_jserv)?
>
> Well, using in-process VM ( like mod_jk ) has many
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > Right now the 'integration' between tomcat and apache is in a very
> > bad shape, the web server is used mostly as a proxy ( that adds a
> > significant overhead, apache+tomcat can be slower than tomcat standalone),
> > and to servle static files ( tha
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:10:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > What are the main advantages to using an in-process VM as opposed
> > to an out-of-process VM bridged over some form of IPC (like
> > mod_webapp/mod_jk/mod_jserv)?
>
> Well, using
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> What are the main advantages to using an in-process VM as opposed
> to an out-of-process VM bridged over some form of IPC (like
> mod_webapp/mod_jk/mod_jserv)?
Well, using in-process VM ( like mod_jk ) has many more benefits than
just reduced request/re
>> Nothing special - just compile jk with support for jni worker, and
>> follow the instructions. You may need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
>> include all the .so from java, and you may have problems with some
>> VMs - JDK1.2.2 seems the easiest to get working, and surprisingly
>> 1.4 worked also fin
Hi !
So what is the conclusion? mod_jk is in proc or out proc?
BTW I am running apache 1.3 with (mod_jk) Tomcat 3.x and it is working well.
Shailesh
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:49:20AM
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:49:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I think option 2 ( in-process ) is what mod_jk is doing - the code has
> > been written and used quite a bit in the last year. It didn't got all the
> > attention that Ajp got, b
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:49:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think option 2 ( in-process ) is what mod_jk is doing - the code has
> been written and used quite a bit in the last year. It didn't got all the
> attention that Ajp got, because it doesn't work with Apache1.3, only
> with IIS
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:41:10AM -, Shailesh S. Gokhale wrote:
> > ***
> > Tomcat can be used as either a stand-alone container (mainly for development and
>debugging) or as an add-on to an existing web server
> > s are supported). This means
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:41:10AM -, Shailesh S. Gokhale wrote:
> ***
> Tomcat can be used as either a stand-alone container (mainly for development and
>debugging) or as an add-on to an existing web server
> s are supported). This means that whenever you are deploying Tomcat you will have t
t running, but that doesn't mean they
> are running
> in the same process space.
>
> > 2. In relation to the above, there seem to be two
> available
> > adapters for the Apache/Tomcat collaboration in the
> Windows
> > environment. One is ApacheModuleJ
wrong though. I think some of them are smart enough to invoke
Tomcat if it isn't running, but that doesn't mean they are running
in the same process space.
> 2. In relation to the above, there seem to be two available
> adapters for the Apache/Tomcat collaboration in the Windows
Hello all!
I have a few questions regarding Apache/Tomcat collaboration. I have tried posting
this message to atleast 3 other forums including the tomcat-user mailing list but no
one has answered my question. This may not be the right place to post it but I have a
feeling that you guys
15 matches
Mail list logo
