Hi !
So what is the conclusion? mod_jk is in proc or out proc?
BTW I am running apache 1.3 with (mod_jk) Tomcat 3.x and it is working well.
Shailesh
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:49:20AM -0700,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I think option 2 ( in-process ) is what mod_jk is
> doing - the code has
> > > been written and used quite a bit in the last year.
> It didn't got all the
> > > attention that Ajp got, because it doesn't work
> with Apache1.3, only
> > > with IIS and NES and Apache2 ( and AolServer ).
> >
> > I had a feeling you did this with other servers -
> just not with httpd.
> > With Apache 2.0? Eh, how? -- justin
>
> Well, I had it working for a while, now it crashes with
> some VMs.
> It's a tricky thing - usually the signals are the
> biggest problem, java
> is very sensitive.
>
> Nothing special - just compile jk with support for jni
> worker, and
> follow the instructions. You may need to set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
> include all the .so from java, and you may have
> problems with some
> VMs - JDK1.2.2 seems the easiest to get working, and
> surprisingly
> 1.4 worked also fine ( I'm talking about Linux versions
> here ).
>
> It's tricky, but I think it's worth it.
>
> Costin
>
