HELLO

Here are your banks documents. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fwd: Bug and Possible Fix in JK 1.2.8 (I am not sure where/how to post this)

Begin forwarded message: From: "Ivo Conde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 15 February 2005 01:43:39 GMT To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug and Possible Fix in JK 1.2.8 (I am not sure where/how to post this) Hi,   I have found a bug and possible fix in the latest version (1.2.8) of the JK Connecto

important document

Please read the attached file! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Error in document

Your important document, correction is finished! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [proxy] New implementation ready for testing

reading and building up that table, enabling, disabling and prioritizing hosts). http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/ApacheModProxy http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/LoadBalancingWithModProxy Pier smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Fwd: md5 sums for jakarta downloads

Begin forwarded message: From: Andy Mudrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10 August 2004 00:57:44 BST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: md5 sums for jakarta downloads Hi,   I noticed that your MD5 sums on your website are not all formatted correctly.  I specifically downloaded the Tomcat 5.0.27 MD5 file,

Document

Important notice! KWF Email scanner found a virus in following attachment: Notice.zip Content type: application/octet-stream Additional information from antivirus: W95/Spaces.gen Attachement has been removed by firewall.

Fwd: an little mistake on site ?

Begin forwarded message: From: "v.z." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 5 January 2004 11:19:40 GMT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: an little mistake on site ? Hi. On download source-site  seems is present en little error. I've tried to check archive  JK 2 Source Release .zip by pgp signature, your prov

Fwd: typo in tomcat site

Not acked. Pier Begin forwarded message: From: Martin Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 18 October 2003 19:07:28 GMT+09:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: typo in tomcat site Hi Jakarta Webmaster, There's a typographic error in http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/c

FW: tomcat binary page links not up

FYI -- Forwarded Message > From: Michael Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:46:52 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat binary page links not up > > Webmaster, > > I'm trying to download a tomcat file on the following page: > > http

FW: Downloading Tomcat 4.06

Getting lots of those lately... Might want to check the website. (It's not mirrored) Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Tye, Rebecca A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:48:16 -0400 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Downloading Tom

[Fwd: Need Tomcat 4.0.6 LE (jdk1.4) Binaries]

Getting a lot of those... You might want to update the links in the website to point to the mirrors? Pier --- Begin Message --- We are using Tomcat 4.0.6 and I need to download binaries, both the Windows install version and for Linux. Recently 4.0.6 downloads have disappeared from your

Re: General question about download

"Grzegorz Paszka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> "Grzegorz Paszka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> i.e ecs, tomcat-4.1.24, >> Any example? > On ftp.task.gda.pl and on sunsit

FW: Files missing from website - webapp module builds

Not acked. Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: Bruce Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:13:35 -0600 > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, &g

FW: broken

Not acked... Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Vijaya Dasari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:18:26 +0100 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: broken > > Hi, > The link > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-d

FW: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector

Not acked... -- Forwarded Message > From: Tony Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:33:01 -0800 (PST) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fwd: jakarta_tomcat_mod_jk connector > > As followup to my previous note, I have contacted redhatLinux, and found that > their version o

FW: Poor documentation for jk

Not acked -- Forwarded Message > From: mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:25:52 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Poor documentation for jk > > Hi Webmaster, > I would like to bring to light the fact that the documentation for the > jk mod to bind apache and tomcat is

FW: openprojects.net name change

FYI, not acked -- Forwarded Message > From: Rob Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:08:50 -0600 (CST) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Rob Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: openprojects.net name change > > Today (Jan 30, 2003) at 01:05 -0600, Rob Levin wrote: > >> To th

FW: dead links ...

> -- Forwarded Message > From: "Adam Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:29:06 -0800 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: dead links ... > > Hello ... > > I was interested in downloading the newest version of Tomcat and all the links > I tried were dead. Here's where

FW: Tomcat IRC link bout to be broken

-- Forwarded Message From: Nicholas Schuetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:57:21 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat IRC link bout to be broken As you may or may not know openprojects.net was bought by freenode.net. Therefore the server address you want has changed to:

FW: documentation error

Not acked... FYI... Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Stoffer, Shawn D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:55:11 -0700 > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: documentation error > > I wished to

FW: GPG key for mod_jk2 2.0.2 not valid ?

FYI, not acked... Can someone look into it? Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:12:14 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GPG key for mod_jk2 2.0.2 not valid ? Hello, I hope you won't mind my email, I'm a bit uns

FW: Broken link, webbaster?

FYI, not acked... -- Forwarded Message From: Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:31:00 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broken link, webbaster? So I'm guessing you know this already, but the link in the top story on jakarta.apache.org ("17 Dec 2002 - Tomcat 4.1.17 S

Re: nagoya down

t want to try straight from the IP address if your DNS is lame and didn't refresh the names yet: http://192.18.33.10/ Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Inputs from a Tomcat user.

quot;addition". It is not _required_. And following Byron's law: "give too much power to lusers and they're going to screw up your system". Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

ingle word as if it were the bible, I believe the message is quite clear)... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

TPD, learn from them, that's the only thing you can do... :-) (suggestion from someone who has been around long enough). New signature! :-) Pier -- [...] mod_webapp, which was *the* main reason for many people not to adopt Tomcat 4.x - Remy MaucheratWorks for me -

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 10/12/02 8:57 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Pier (a _user_ now) > > And that's sad. Not apparently, as I am the reason why noone picked up Tomcat 4 :-) Pier -- T

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

omcat state That's what I was asking... > "more > or less what Jon does for Scarab, but to a greater degree, maybe even > reimplementing some of the Standard* classes" It's in the archives... Pier :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 10/12/02 1:06 "Justyna Horwat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess the high art of potty humor is not lost on idiots. My buttocks > are clenched in anticipation for the Pier (C) and TM fart jokes. :) Damn you know me far too well, Justy! :-) Pier -- To unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

mn... I _knew_ I had a reason to be upset... Tonia, thanks, I owe you two favours for this one (next time I'm in the US!) Pier Original Message Subject: Re: 5.0 proposal Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 21:49:51 +0100 From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

I was coding earlier... :-) >> So, please, don¹t come up on a mailing list saying "that is secure", just >> say that "noone has found a bug yet", because that (and only that) is the >> truth... >> > I agree my wording was not appropriate. Should say that in french next > time :-) Pas de problemes (where are the accents on this keyboard?) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

ind it. I believe it never even went to [VOTE]... Got shut down before.. I usually have the bad habit of asking others before proposing votes... And, well, sometimes I don't really use that [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] thing... I just hope that open minded people will read and give opinions on a free

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 9/12/02 23:51 "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ehemm... With 24 pages of vulnerability notes? Ha.. Hahaha Hahahaha! :-) Correction to self... Not 24 pages... 24 notes... (Ok, I have an eyesight test tomorrow morning at 10:20 in SOHO... I know, I know...

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 9/12/02 23:38 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> On 9/12/02 15:16 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to >>> h

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 9/12/02 23:06 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> On 9/12/02 17:14 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

to call it "Tomcat-HA" or something like it, you said: "If possible, please also change the name - unless ASF gives you permission to use tomcat name in your product." I _love_ fairness and justice in this world... What-EVER! Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

n, at least I won't get holes from all the other (totally useless) components... Pier (a _user_ now) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

\ >Jasper Velocity > / \ \ > Admin Tool (JMX) Java Server Feces Scarab Jon... That spelling of JSF is (C) and TM Pier 2002 :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

red by all Tomcat > users, but I'm sure a lot of them like to have the Admin Tool . That is what I'm asking myself... What's the point in all this useless crap? Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 8/12/02 0:43 "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 2002/12/7 4:25 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jon, I'm very sorry mate, you're 4 months too late :-( I lost my fight about >> this very same

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 7/12/02 16:32 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The "majority" decision works only if enough people vote. > > So far we have: > +1: Jon, Pier, Bill > -0: Costin > -1: Remy > > Anyone else ? For the records, please check

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 6/12/02 16:09 "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x: > > +1 [X] > 0 [ ] > -1 [ ] Or simply use Jetty :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

mulator", but AFAICR, it ships currently with GLIBC-5 ... You'd better off recompiling the module (Apache part) native for FreeBSD and the JNI lib for Linux GLIBC-5... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: mod_jk-2.0.42.so

you're in troubles. Update your Linux install to something more recent (including the new LIBC) or recompile the whole kit-n-kaboodle... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: SSI Security Hack

t; to support the #exec command. > > [Just trying to keep an eye on end-user simplicity] NO code is ever secure... Less stuff you distribute, fewer times Tomcat will show up on BugTrack... That's my rule-of-the-thumb, at least... IMO, even Jasper should be renamed to .renametojar, but t

Re: ServletContext.getContext() still completely broken.

nored? I wouldn't worry too much about it now... It might even be deprecated in the servlet specification in the future... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

FW: Apache Tomcat

FYI > -- Forwarded Message > From: Manjiri Devdhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:23:52 +0530 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Apache Tomcat > > Hello, > > > > This is Manjiri from Wrox Press Ltd taking care of the Open source titles.

Re: JSPC refactoring/documentation

ike friggin' schema). If you have questions regarding JSR-154 (requirements/info/...) contact me as I'm still the official representative for the ASF on the JCP expert group. Have fun... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

FW: R: GOODBYE from tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org

Who unsubbed this guy on Fri Nov 1 03:31:13 PST 2002??? 1036089107 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not a probe, so, someone (one of the moderators, I believe), unsubbed him manually (see at the bottom). Any reason why? Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: "Luca Ventura"

Re: production quality?

uld not send those headers... It will also impact client (browser) caches, not only mod_proxy... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Re: production quality?

to text/html. > > Further requests to mod_proxy without "If-Modified-Since" results in > GIFs with strange content types. Thank god for IE not trusting the > content type :) Nope, that's not it, but it's a good catch. We don't keep proxied content cache

Re: production quality?

e the "outcome" of this? (I mean you know any way in which I can find out if this is the bug we're seeing) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Someone fix this...

On 29/10/02 11:35 pm, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/10/02 23:02, "Mike Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> DOH! >> >> Sorry. Thats what you get when you get a Non-Unix weanie to play around on a >&

Re: [4.1.14] New test milestone released

On 30/10/02 9:19 am, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ALL directories need to be 755 (therefore only THOSE and NOT THE FILES need >> to have the +x bit set) they need to look like "drwxrwxr-x" > > Why 755 on directory ? Shouldn't they be 775 to allow group member to > update them ? Oh

Re: [4.1.14] New test milestone released

about, make sure you do "man chmod" and "man umask" from your favorite Linux (HAHA!) box... Seriously speaking, now, with the way in which the files for 4.1.14 are laid out, they can't be moved, deleted, removed, updated, mirrored by anyone but Remy (nah, p

Re: Someone fix this...

d be fixed now. Rsync should run in another 5 hours now... Will see tomorrow in the morning. Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Someone fix this...

/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0/bin/netware/nsapi_rd.nlm .asc: Permission denied Files not mirrored... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Re: 10/29/02 Notes

One might still feel he's on the pteam! :-) pier On 29/10/02 22:00, "Jean-Francois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oups..wrong list...sorry. > > -- Jeanfrancois > Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: > >> are available under >> >&

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

ds appair also in ps but I have not (yet) tried > to kill one ;-) It can provide hours of entertainment... Last time I tried it was _so_ wicked! :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

On 28/10/02 22:40, "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 00:31, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Those are _not_ processes, they are threads... Use a decent operating system >> that supports them nicely (not Linux) and you'll see the

Re: [OT]Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

"micael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What operating system do you prefer, Pier? We use Solaris both for Intel and Sun platforms... First reason being is that we _know_ how that OS works, it's much more tuneable on live systems, and much easier to configure when yo

Re: Réf. : Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how tomanage and benchmark ?

boxes, with about 512Mo of RAM, and in front an Apache > 1.3/2.0 box + mod_jk. Or just one Sun dual 440 UltraSparc IIi, 1 Gb/ram, Solaris 8 and some tweaks (all in one box). That's our config, and that's roughly our traffic (ok, maybe 300/400 concurrent request). Henri's right...

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

is faster (and I believe we _all_ agree that Windows sucks!) :-) Anyhow, the old battle on why Linux sucks is over... Works for you, well, use it! :-) Pier (MacOS/X rocks!) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Re: TOMCAT memory usage : how to manage and benchmark ?

esses, they are threads... Use a decent operating system that supports them nicely (not Linux) and you'll see the difference (how many times do I have to repeat this?)... Linux sucks :-( Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Problems mirroring the tomcat distribution site...

: Permission denied Can you guys (remm and mmanders) make sure you have the privileges set corretly? Please (to the list) when updating stuff in /build make sure the correct privileges are set as that stuff is mirrored... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscr

WEB.XML not reloaded???

Anyone noticed that the web.xml doesn't get reloaded when I reload a deployed context under 4.0? Or is it me being stupid? Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] tomcat-commiters list

ailing list (but -dev -cvs and -users) to keep all projects more-or-less in sync... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

On 11/10/02 3:14, "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 2002/10/10 6:50 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I can tell you that our main Java instance for VNUNET.COM takes >> approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start..

Re: Cannot build mod_webapp.so on Solaris 8

On 10/10/02 22:23, "James C. McMaster (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this is not the proper place to ask configuration questions, but I do > not believe this is such. Use mod_jk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

nstance for VNUNET.COM takes approximately 4 to 5 minutes to start... If I don't reply to HTTP when that thing is down, I'm going to loose my job, so it's not something I feel that in a real-life production environment comes handy... That said, if that's your itch, scratch it...

Re: jk2 and daemon ( was Re: commons-daemon release ?)

orget about it, also because if you tie it to the web server process, when you take down the Web Server, also your servlet engine is going to go down, and that's not a very desirable feature given how much time it takes to initialize 7/8 web applications Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

ut kicking JSP out of the door! :-) I'm not going to run 1.4 in production for quite some time :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Tired...

Since I'm tired of you lot, I'm going to say goodbye and retire in lala-land <http://www.psc.edu/science/tang.html>... Have fun and try not to hit bugtrack too often! :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cannot Build WebApp on Solaris 2.8

On 27/9/02 0:22, "Jay Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I followed the "Building the WebApp module" exactly and cannot build the > webapp module for Solaris 2.8 using gcc 2.95. After a successful > ./configure ... , I get the following errors on the make: Use mod_jk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Jasper 2 Question

On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 10:24 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 04:30, Lenny Karpel wrote: > >> is it right that when I ask a serious question about jasper2 that I >> get >> these totally ridiculous answers ? > > Well, Jon and Pier are

Re: Jasper 2 Question

ution to your problem of line numbers, if that's ridiculous, well, that's _your_ problem... Not mine.... Die, JSPs, DII! :-) Pier On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 07:30 PM, Lenny Karpel wrote: > is it right that when I ask a serious question about jasper2 th

Re: Jasper 2 Question

You can use some tea... http://opensource.go.com/ :-) Pier On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 10:33 PM, Lenny Karpel wrote: > I use IntelliJ's IDEA product for Tomcat relared development .. I > noted the > following statement in thier bugs mailing list with regards t

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

ess it must be, it's on gnu.org. > > Obviously it would be good if all tars could read each others' > archives. [pier@bubbles] ~ $ gnutar --help GNU `tar' saves many files together into a single tape or disk archive, and can restore individual files from the archive.

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

"Ian Darwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 07:22:43PM -0700, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: >> >> Pier, you need to use GNU tar. *BSD* tar sucks balls. > > Er, you mean perhaps that BSD tar doesn't yet support the > non-stan

Re: Tomcat not scaling very well...

ue for all you 500 threads reported by PS ALL TOGETHER). One thing to check is also the output of "lsof", gives you some very good insight of what's going on... My recommendation is to stop using autoreload, and use IBM's VM because for what I can remember, it handles more file descriptors better than Sun's... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Small code contribution

go about doing this. I hope this doesn't browse the file system on the server, thru servlet and/or JSP calls or something like that, because if so -1 for security reasons. Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PATCH] for bug#12049: symlinked directories, jsp pages arenot served

ee major concerns in allowing symlinked files or directories... Also, few lines below, the check should be done for OS/X as well, given that the file system is case insensitive, and for Unix operating systems if they mount network shared volumes in case those are case unsensitive (SMB with case

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

"Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >>> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100 >>> From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100 >> From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

4.1.10 tarball is borked.

. (of course no errors in the .zip distribution, remember that WinZip doesn't friggin built correct TAR archives)... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

FW: [NAGOYA.APACHE.ORG] RSYNC Output

irrors with a good 43 megabytes of downloads completely useless, and which costed I don't know how much (but a lot) to Collab.NET which is kindly paying for bandwidth! Pier -- Forwarded Message > From: Rsync Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 6 Sep 2002 12:00:31 -

Fwd: Broken link

Not acked Begin forwarded message: > From: Jørgen Nørgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue Aug 20, 2002 14:17:23 Europe/London > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Broken link > > On http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.html there is a link to > Tomcat 4.0.2 srcs > (http://jakarta.apac

Fwd: Minor bug in Tomcat docs

Not acked. Begin forwarded message: > From: Asuja Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri Aug 16, 2002 09:09:44 Europe/London > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Minor bug in Tomcat docs > > Hi! >   > On page > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/appdev/deploy

Fwd: Tomcat 4.03 / 4.04 source download incorrect.

Not acked Begin forwarded message: > From: "Lukas Hazlehurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed Aug 14, 2002 01:05:07 Europe/London > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Tomcat 4.03 / 4.04 source download incorrect. > > Hello, >   > Just thought i'd mention that the link > onhttp://jakarta.apach

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Release numbering scheme and test releases

ilestones for Tomcat 5.0 on a regular basis soon > -1 [X] No, later > Get 4.1 out of the door first. Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: HotSpot Virtual Machine Error : 11

"Ed Borkmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Please report this error at > # http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi Can't you read what you post? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Diffie Hellman

e when started in ssl mode ? I believe it depends on JSSI to do the cypher negotiation. Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: webapp/apr cvs tags?

"Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neil, > > I will try tonight if I encounter the same problem. BTW, if you can > choose, why not move to httpd 2.0? At least Pier and me support it! ;-) That's for sure! :) Apache 2.0 rocks :) Pier -- To unsu

Re: webapp/apr cvs tags?

"Neil Cronin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > are you looking at the apache code, apr, or mod_webapp? All the three codebases (given my involvement lately - Pier is moving to HTTPD and APR :) > all versions of mod_webapp compile fine with the trunk of apr, but none will &

Re: [Fwd: webapp/apr cvs tags?]

ly an APR bug (if threads are disabled, the atomic code should just not use it)... Will report it. Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: webapp/apr cvs tags?

e are working on... Few days, maybe a couple of weeks. Pier "Neil Cronin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to build mod_webapp for apache 1.3.26. I grabbed webapp and > apr from cvs.apache.org. it seems to build fine: > > # ./configure --with-apr=.

Re: [OT] Leaving Sun

e to the family of the now-Europeanized ex-Sun employees... Hope it works as it worked out for me! :) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Connectors on MacOS X

Tobias Wunden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) Provide Information on dlopen Build on top of APR and that problem goes away. That's why APR is the way to go, right? Pier -- I love introducing bug: "Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation, Access Violation, thi

FW: Jakarta-tomcat page requires update

Not acked... Pier -- I love introducing bug: "Floating Point Exception this is Access Violation, Access Violation, this is Floating Point Exception". Eric Prud'Hommeaux -- Forwarded Message From: R Andrew Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >