Dan,
STAR! :-)
Thanks to you and henri for making this kick ass!
cheers,
-Thom, making note to liberally distribute beer to both of you if he gets
the chance
* Dan Milstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Fri Mar 23, 2001 at 11:55:42 -0500:
> Thom,
>
> There was vigorous back and forth about this o
Folks,
has anything happened with vhost support with mod_jk/apache 1.3 in 3.3?
I've not had a chance to look recently and I really need it...
ta,
-Thom, stuck in wet and miserable london for the next 3 weeks
1) It's a good habit to get into. HTML mail is evil, wastes bandwidth and
most mailers won't format it.
2) If you post html to say, [EMAIL PROTECTED], you would get
flamed so hard your mailbox would be filled for months to come.
3) JUST DON't DO IT!
Oh, and wrap at 76 characters too please :-)
-T
* Sam Ruby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Mon Feb 12, 2001 at 01:39:07PM -0500:
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> >
> > It's always going to be the case that the Avalon and Tomcat releases
> > don't sync up perfectly. How would you feel about making any Tomcat
> > changes necessary to support the Avalon patc
* Dan Milstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Fri Jan 26, 2001 at 01:27:09PM -0500:
> Thom,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> 1) The mod_jk howto / vhosts
>
> The mod_jk user docs are (as far as I can tell) kind of a mess. I have a
> medium-term goal of overhauling them and cleaning them up, bu
* Dan Milstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Fri Jan 26, 2001 at 01:27:09 -0500:
> Thom,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> 1) The mod_jk howto / vhosts
>
> The mod_jk user docs are (as far as I can tell) kind of a mess. I have a
> medium-term goal of overhauling them and cleaning them up, but
Hi Dan.
I really appreciate the work you're doing on Apache -> Tomcat connectivity!
Couple of questions first:
1) (totally unrelated) the mod_jk howto seems to suggest that mod_jk is
useable from _inside_
apache VirtualHost statements. However, practical experience - ands much
screaming ;) - have
Someone please unsubscribe this joker before he manages to mailloop himself
into oblivion :)
-Thom
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Mon Jan 22, 2001 at 08:00:58
+:
> Delivery failure: javax.mail.MessagingException: 452 Filesystem error - message not
>accepted
> Delivery fail
* Paulo Gaspar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Thu Jan 18, 2001 at 11:49:41 +0100:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 04:29
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys,
reading my way through the documentation, i've been
finding things that look "wrong"- I'm creating patches
for the obvious bits as I go, but I think this one needs to be done...
What do you think?
cheers,
-Thom
Index: src/doc/Tomcat-Workers-HowTo.html
===
*Wipes brow*
ok, I'll gracefully run away from this one then ;-)
-Thom
Amy: deb packages for JDK1.3 (blackdown jdk) at
deb http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.blackdown.org/java-linux/debian/ woody non-free
HTH
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:28:32 +0900, Takashi Okamoto said:
> > I didn't know much a
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 05:24:01 +, Andrew Savory said:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Thom May wrote:
>
> > I would be interested in hearing from folks here whether they percieve
> > a need for Debian packaging, or whether they prefer to "roll their
> > own"?
>
Hi Henri,
on a similar note, I am currently beginning the long road into
the Debian project. I have already stated that I wish to take
over the packaging for Cocoon, and am currently debating whether to try
to do Tomcat as well. I would be interested in hearing from
folks here whether they perciev
13 matches
Mail list logo
