> I was off the list for a while. I tried to read through the
> archives but all
> the vitriol gave me a headache. Did they just agree to
> disagree? Do you
> think there'll be a problem with proposing to remove the 3.2
> docs from the site?
>From what I remember, 3.3 is a major refactoring
> Anyway, I agree with Rob. I would like to see a committer
> bring at least
> #1 to a vote at this point. That way we can at least get the
>From Craig and Pier, we have a "negative" on the applicability of TC3<->TC4
docs. I believe Henri thinks otherwise. Would any other knowledgeable
partie
> How about "(Web?) Application Developers' Guide", to more
> closely map to the
> servlet spec terminology. For the other bit, maybe "Container
> Architecture Guide".
> I think we should avoid the phrase "Tomcat Developer" since,
> as this mailing list
> proves, many application developers th
More refinements... if i didn't quote it, I agree with it =) BTW, what
does "AW" in a subject line mean? I see it all the time...
0) Introduction to the TC4 container
ADD > - Requirements (JDK versions, extra libs?, etc.)
1) "User's Guide" (or "Administrator's")
> - Tomcat and different
...and thank you btw =) I'm getting more excited now since this is exactly
the type of discussion I hoped we would be in! (re: suggesting different
sections, etc.)
I'll just throw this out there and everyone can quote it, etc. It contains
a few of mine, and all of Martin's (spliced, relocated,
For the record, I'm going to keep track of the different proposals in a
separate doc. For the TC docs - what to include, the glue, etc.
I'm no longer participating in the "how do we store it or what format do we
use" discussion =)
- r
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin van den Bemt [m
> What a whiner ;-)j/k, honest, I perceive the Devil's advocacy
> role. It is true, most OS projects suffer from this, but only
> from an outsider's point of view. The people who develop the
> stuff and use it all the time, DO NOT NEED DOCUMENTATION.
> People who do not participate, DO. S
;, what do you mean?
>
> How are these beans being instantiated and added to the application?
>
> Paul Hunnisett wrote:
> >
> > The application is not being shut down! Yet somehow my
> beans are getting
> > "reset".
> >
> > Paul
&
t: RE: Tomcat and Beans
>
>
> The application is not being shut down! Yet somehow my beans
> are getting
> "reset".
>
> Paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Slifka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 June 2001 13:26
> To: '[EMAIL PR
>From "The Java Programming Language, 3rd. Ed"
"When an application exits, no further GC is performed, so any objects that
have not yet been collected will not have their finalize() methods invoked."
- r
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Hunnisett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: June
On pg. 107 of the JSP spec, it says that
out = pageContext.popBody();
is executed after doAfterBody() when SKIP_BODY is returned, but before
doEndTag().
So this means that all I have to do is return SKIP_BODY from doAfterBody()
and the processed (unmodified in my case) body content will be outp
I've only recently re-subscibed to the user list, but so far, since last
summer, the average quality of question seems way down. I guess it's a
testament to Tomcat's increasing popularity. People think, "oh, Tomcat!"
then they come here and email to the user list, "How do i install and
configure
Who's doing docs nowadays?
Mike B, are you still reading tomcat-dev?
- r
13 matches
Mail list logo
