Re: [PROPOSAL] Add Post to the clear list for protected pages

2003-07-21 Thread Michael Smith
Costin Manolache wrote: Bill Barker wrote: At the moment (with the default settings), Tomcat 4.1.x and higher add HTTP headers to non-SSL protected pages to prevent intermediate proxies from caching them. According to the HTTP/1.1 RFC (and even the HTTP/1.0 RFC), POSTed pages are not allowed to

Re: JK2 module for AOLserver

2003-03-27 Thread Michael Smith
Alexander Leyke wrote: Hi, A question about enhancement adoption process - how long does it typically take for new code to show up in CVS, in nightly builds? What is the verification process for new code? I have posted enhancement request to the mailing list and to Bugzilla (http://issues.apac

Re: Shutdown.sh does not work when long lasting operations, suchas SQL Queries, are still active!

2003-02-11 Thread Michael Smith
Tim Funk wrote: Why is a kill done instead of a System.exit()? System.exit() is a cleaner solution, but there are plenty of cases where tomcat won't shut down at all with this solution, so a kill is needed (either as suggested, or manually/externally). For example, I had a bug in a webapp a w

Re: MOVE method processing of WebdavServlet

2002-12-19 Thread Michael Smith
Yokota Takehiko wrote: Hi, all. There is a question about WebdavServlet in Tomcat4.1.12. I tried to send MOVE request to WebdavServlet and I expected that a file was moved, but it was copied and deleted. I think org.apache.catalina.servlets.WebdavServlet#doMove() should move resource instead of

Re: Thread priority

2002-12-16 Thread Michael Smith
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I was wondering about how expensive the Thread.setPriority method is, and to which extent it does what it advetises. Remy, Thread.setPriority will (in a native threading implementation, rather than something like the old green-threads JVM) be a system call, so it's

Re: Tomcat memory management

2002-11-11 Thread Michael Smith
Scott Johnson wrote: > > Hello, > > We've got an application that is replicated for clients, each > replication runs in its own context. We're running jdk1.4.1, RH7.2, > Tomcat 4.0.6 > > Even though the application itself can run fine on 10mb RAM, as each > context initializes, EVERY thread allo

Re: Bug 13736

2002-10-20 Thread Michael Smith
Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Bill Barker wrote: > > > I don't remember anything like that for 3.3.x (and nothing even close is > > open in BZ). But, then again, I don't imagine that very many people > > try and > > use the Http10Connector in production, and Coyote is only available in the > > night

Re: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG?

2002-10-02 Thread Michael Smith
micael wrote: > > I cannot see any difference relative to the invoker filter, ExampleFilter, > in the web.xml for Tomcat 4.1.10 versus 4.1.12. Nothing seems to be > commented out. I must be missing some point here. What is it? The invoker servlet, whilst still defined in 4.1.12, has no servle

Re: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG?

2002-10-01 Thread Michael Smith
micael wrote: > > I cannot access a webapp with the normal > http://localhost:8080/myapp/servlet/mydirectory.MyServlet with Tomcat > 4.1.12. (Also, the embedded Tomcat 4.1.12 in JBoss 3.0.3 runs fine except > that it won't access the examples servlets.) The error shown is a 404 "The > requested

PATCH: DbcpDataSourceFactory

2002-05-09 Thread Michael Smith
The DataSource factory wasn't setting maxIdle, and was incorrectly setting maxActive on the connection pool. This fixes it: Michael Index: DbcpDataSourceFactory.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/sha

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_registry.cjk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c

2001-11-19 Thread Michael Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Michael Smith wrote: > > > Ah. That'd be my misunderstanding of how things work... > > _without_ that signature change, though, things still won't compile > > (well, they probably will. With _really_ nas

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_registry.c jk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c

2001-11-19 Thread Michael Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > costin 01/11/19 10:14:38 > > Modified:jk/native/common jk_registry.c jk_env.c jk_channel_socket.c > Log: > Patch from Michael Smith. > > One change I didn't apply is the signature change in jk_env_objectFactor

PATCH: more fixes for jakarta-tomcat-connectors

2001-11-19 Thread Michael Smith
casts for those. Everything builds nicely under MSVC6 now. Michael Smith Index: jk_env.c === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_env.c,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 jk_env.c --- jk_env.c

PATCH: jakarta-tomcat-connectors build on MSVC6

2001-11-19 Thread Michael Smith
Here's a patch for clean builds on MSVC6 - includes a couple of missing headers, and adds JK_METHOD attributes to the neccesary functions (otherwise calling conventions are declared differently, and you get compilation-fatal errors). Michael Smith Index: jk_channel_soc

tomcat4, webdav, and IIS

2001-08-09 Thread Michael Smith
Hi all, I'm trying to set up tomcat4.0 (cvs, few days old), talking through mod_jk (java bits compiled today from cvs, native bits the most recent compiled version I could find - I don't have a copy of devstudio here) to IIS (5.0, on win2k), using isapi_redirect.dll . That bit works fine. Then I

chunked input bugfix

2001-05-31 Thread Michael Smith
Yesterday I saw a bunch of 500 errors come up from a servlet we're running. Fortunately, it turned out that there was a full stacktrace in the log file. I think the error itself was due to transient network faults (or client bugs)at the client end of things, so it's not a problem that tomcat rej

accept() errors

2001-03-15 Thread Michael Smith
Hi, My server (tomcat 4.0, nightly built from about a week ago, running on a linux system) stopped responding some time last night. The logs contain nothing of substance except this: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method

RE: String/StringBuffer (was Re: An alternative to JSP)

2001-01-26 Thread Michael . Smith
> Last paragraph in the java.lang.String javadoc says: > > The Java language provides special support for the string > concatentation operator > ( + ), and for conversion of other objects to strings. String > concatenation is > implemented through the StringBuffer class and its append > method

RE: Jakarta PMC Meeting Agenda / Info

2001-01-15 Thread Michael . Smith
Since you've posted the URL again, I went back and read the initial proposal again. Each time I read the proposal, I'm left with the same thoughts. First, let me quote part Craig's message that started the thread and the voting: "To facilitate development of Tomcat 4.0, without compromising o